The simple main effect of Age was only marginally significant for auditory response rates for angry face and happy voice ( F (4, 389) = 2.12, p = .077).
Excerpts
Although a trend appeared when infection was pooled together, showing nearly significant higher prevalence of infection in mainland ( P = 0.077; Fig 2 , Table 2 ).
showed a trendp = 0.077
However, analysis using student t-test showed a trend towards a significant increase in uIAPP plasma levels in AD patients compared to NCs (p = 0.077).
marginally non-significantP = 0.077
We performed a Pearson correlation between the untransformed means of the two main behaviors of the 1 st factor, aggression and nest relocation, that confirmed to some extent the negative relationship (a marginally non-significant trend: Bartlett χ 2 statistic = 3.12, df = 1, P = 0.077).
showed a trendp = 0.077
Haplotype analysis of the block 2 SNPs showed a trend for association (omnibus p = 0.077), with the major haplotype (red) more frequent in affected cases (F_A) than unaffected controls (F_U), representing a risk haplotype.
showed a trendP <0.077
Comparison of the mean BOLD activity levels between EG and CG showed a trend toward a difference for the Transfer run ( t (26) = 1.839, P <0.077).
There was marginal significance ( p = 0.077) in heterogeneity and Higgins’ I 2 was 38.5% ( Fig 2b ).
almost reached significanceP = 0.077
No relation between study size (regression coefficient = −0.109, 95% CI: −0.231, 0.012; P = 0.075, baseline depression severity (regression coefficient = 0.026, 95% CI: −0.007, 0.060; P = 0.116), trial duration (regression coefficient = −0.058, 95% CI: −0.153, 0.038; P = 0.223), age of patients (regression coefficient = 0.013, 95% CI: −0.10, 0.036; P = 0.879), and study quality (regression coefficient = −0.142, 95% CI: −0.357, 0.072; P = 0.183) and omega-3 PUFA efficacy was found, despite study quality almost reached significance when considered only for RCTs conducted on patients with MDD (regression coefficient = −0.403, 95% CI: −0.857, 0.052; P = 0.077).
The effect of condition on how enjoyable conversation partners rated the interaction was approaching significance ( p = .077).
There was also a marginally significant interaction of religious group and religious identification on guilt ratings, b = 0.25, CI 95 [-.027, .528], p = .077.
Repeated measures ANOVA for TIMExAWARENESS demonstrated no main effect of time (F(8, 64) = 0.5811, p = 0.817), or awareness (F(1, 8) = 1.0328, p = 0.374), with an interaction effect nearing significance (F(8, 64) = 2.1245, p = 0.077).
It is partly proven since both treatments decreased saliva secretion (isoproterenol almost reached statistical significance with p = 0.0771) and had submandibular myoepithelial cells with attenuated ACE expressions.
Moving away had a marginally significant effect on length of stay (HR = 0.38, P = 0.078).
This indicates a reduced but marginally significant (p = 0.078) greater estimated proportion of Mtb infection as defined by TST compared to IGRA even when restricting our sample to a population where the possibility of BCG cross-reactivity was minimized.
Adding in the condition dummy variables (Model 2), we find similar patterns to our group-level analysis (H1) except that the MPCR-constant dummy variable is only marginally significant (.119) F = 3.170, p = .078, and remains so in Model 3 (H2).
a trend towards significancep = 0.078
In contrast, low nNO (<200 nl/min) was not significantly correlated with any of these respiratory symptom categories, although a trend towards significance was observed for increase in ARS (p = 0.078; Table 3 ) and PCD (p = 0.071; Table 3 ) symptoms.
Mindfulness and leader trustworthiness As shown in Table 2 , the particularized pathway of leader trustworthiness did not significantly predict mindful attention, γ = .03 [95% CI:–.07, .13], t (999) = 0.53, p = .600, while the generalized pathway was marginally significant: γ = .16 [95% CI:–.02, .34], t (177) = 1.78, p = .078.
Furthermore, the difference between novel metaphoric and anomalous word dyads was marginally significant over midline electrodes ( p = .078).
The equivalent analyses for mean diclofenac concentrations in those samples with detectable levels indicated that concentrations were also lower in T3 than in T1 ( T + = 27, N = 7, one-tailed P = 0.016), and had a marginally significant tendency to be lower in T3 than T2 ( T + = 18, N = 6, one-tailed P = 0.078).
The average size of Myh3-positive objects was determined and it was found that the TA (A) exhibited a strong trend for a delay in the growth of Myh3-positive cells (P = 0.078), while the delay in growth in the gastrocnemius (GAS) (B) was statistically significant (interaction: P<0.05).
normal (N) based on the Mann-Whitney test were: significant for palladin (p-value = 0.016; median = 0.75 in T and 0.375 in N), marginally significant for α-SMA (p-value = 0.078; median = 0.75 in T and 0.5 in N), significant for EDA (p-value = 0.010; median = 0.625 in T and 0.125 in N) and relatively unchanged for stroma control pan-collagen (p-value = 0.364; median = 0.50 in T and 0.50 in N).
The relationship in H3 between perceived ease of use (PEU) and attitude towards use (ATU) holds true for Generation Z, with a strongly significant path coefficient (0.298, p = 0.001); it is lower (0.229) and weakly significant (p = 0.078) for Generation Y and vanishes (0.067) for Generation X + (p = 0.541).
marginally non-significantp = 0.078
In the middle catchment, spring displays a significant positive trend (tau: 0.459, p < 0.0001) with an increase in rainfall, whereas summer has a marginally non-significant negative trend (tau: -0.193, p = 0.078), and winter and autumn show no significant trends.
In the crude model (step 1), the associations between being bullied and work engagement were marginally significant ( β = .032, P = .078); however, being bullied at school ( β = .042, p = .018) was significantly and positively associated with work engagement after adjusting for demographic characteristics in step 2.
TSS was significantly higher in samples that were positive for the CF, and EV markers by between 1 and 1.5 mg/L (p<0.05); these differences were only weakly significant for CF and EV markers (p = 0.078 and p = 0.096, respectively).