There was no significant difference between the total costs per patient per day from the four selected outbreaks in the national data (median €81.89) and the data from the on-site audit (median €109.87), however, there was a trend towards significance (p = 0.068, Z = -1.826).
Additionally, there was a positive trend toward EPDS scores at 6 months predicting change in Visual Reception (p = 0.068).
The effect closer to significance was a main age group effect for the strictly episodic score F (1,46) = 3.49, MSE = 6.02, p = .068, η p 2 = .07, where older adults showed numerically lower specificity ( M = 0.55, SD = 0.66) than younger adults ( M = 0.91, SD = 0.66).
This difference was, however, only borderline significant (p = 0.068; Wilcoxon rank sum test).
The interaction became near-significant ( P = 0.068, AIC = 262.7; Table 4 ), when also the average total per-locus frequency of the SAE indvN, A <1 alleles ( Table 3 ) was included as main factor, together with its interactions with 3yr-pre-birth rainfall and sex.
Only the main effect of congruency approached significance [ F (2, 42) = 2.870, p = .068, η p 2 = .120], with error rates being slightly larger for the incongruent (M = 13.3%, SEM = 3%) as compared to the congruent and neutral conditions (M = 12.78%, SEM = 2.9% and M = 12.1%, SEM = 2.8%, respectively).
Note that the difference in genotyping accuracy between hospital and commercial participants was almost significant ( P = 0.068).
Furthermore, ordinal regression analysis used to predict tumor stage indicated that metastasis was the only highly significant factor (P < 0.001), while tumor size showed a trend toward significance (P = 0.068). 3.5.
Although ΦST and Jost’s D values show low levels of differentiation for Mc1r; the P-values are just marginally insignificant (ΦST = 0.006 p = 0.068 D j = 0.079, p = .066).
Accurate responses were significantly faster for good images than bad images (892 ms and 1028 ms respectively; t(8) = 8.82, p <0.001), and this effect was significant across all the categories (t(8) = 8.53, p <0.001 for beaches; t(8) = 6.27, p <0.001 for forests; t(8) = 4.42, p <0.01 for highways; t(8) = 5.2, p <0.001 for mountains and t(8) = 2.58, p <0.05 for offices) except for city streets in which the difference was marginally significant (t(8) = 2.10, p = 0.068).
Unilateral MMD showed a trend to reduced temporal correlations of low-frequency BOLD signals compared with bilateral MMD (p = 0.068).
After adjusting for gender, age, marital status, education level, self-reported psychiatric diagnosis, and COVID-19 wave, the direct effect of FCV-19S on PHQ-9 was rendered marginally significant ( β = 0.098, 95% CI [−0.01, 0.20], p = 0.068; S1 Table ).
We found an association close to significance between high LDH levels and presence of CCND2 , MYC or BCL6 mRNA in plasma ( p = 0.068 for the 3 mRNA, χ 2 test).
Comparisons between the search types showed a significant difference at the first session (separate = 2.0, parallel = 2.3, t (12) = 3.638, p = 0.003) and a slight trend at the second session (separate = 1.2, parallel = 1.3, t (12) = 2.006, p = 0.068) with parallel searches requiring more presentations.
Negative Affect For the negative affect scale, the main effect of time approached significance, F (1,26) = 3.62, p = .068, η p 2 = 0.12.
Moreover, as for d′, 7-day correct response rate of non-words learned prior to wakeful resting was higher than 15-minute correct response rate of non-words learned prior to the spot-the-difference task, and this difference was close to significance ( F (1, 52) = 3.473, p = .068).
There was no difference between men and women ( p = 0.94), but the rural population had a higher prevalence than the urban population, with borderline significance ( p = 0.068).
7 ), indicating that rapamycin had an effect on subpopulations of both C- and Aδ- nociceptive fibers, though this did not quite reach significance (overall effect F 1,112 = 3.4, P = 0.068).
Moreover, the differences of ERPs elicited by “NAL” and “NA” prosodies were marginally significant over left hemisphere ( p = .068).
The main effect of Direct-gaze face duration approached significance, F (1,54) = 3.472, p = .068, η 2 p = .06, reflecting the tendency to commit more errors at the longer ( M = 2.4%, SE = .25) than at the shorter ( M = 2%, SE = .17) duration.
Neither predictor was significant at the 5% level, although the effect of Nutri-Score approached significance (p = .068).
Both the annual and winter PDO indices displayed marginally significant positive trends (p = 0.068 and 0.032 respectively).
The main effect of the A 260 absorbance was negative and almost significant (Est = -1.08, p-value = 0.068).
However, in the Cox regression models, treatment was the only significant variable (P = 0.031), although D* CER was nearly significant ( P = 0.068).
For women, those who had already retired had shorter telomeres than their employed peers ( P = 0.026), with those unable to work through ill health also nearing significance for shorter telomeres ( P = 0.068) ( Table S6 ).