Excerpts

This relationship was marginally significant for those in racially homogeneous schools, r s (39) = .26, p = .06, but non-significant for those in racially heterogeneous schools, r s (29) = .16, p = .20.

Circulating ADMA increased and approached significance (p< 0.06).

the older the patient, the faster onset of symptoms), yet it was not fully significant (coefficient = -0.2, p = 0.06).

PSS: 20.79 kg/m2) was only marginally significant ( p = 0.06 ), and the grip force (SSS: 411 N vs.

The 3×2×6 mixed ANOVA with between-subjects factors group (learners, non-learners, or controls), and within-subjects factors training run (first run, last run) and BMA parameter (V-SPL, SPL-V, up_V, up_SPL, up_V-SPL, up_SPL-V) revealed a significant main effect of group (F(1,2) = 5.49, p = 0.04), a significant main effect of BMA parameter (F(1,5) = 3.66, p = 0.01), and a strong trend towards significance in the 3-way interaction between group×training run×BMA parameter (F(1,10) = 1.91, p = 0.06).

The results showed a trend towards reduced lipid peroxidation (3.5±2.4% vs 5.6±3.7%, p = 0.06, HMGB1 vs control) while superoxide production was significantly reduced in the HMGB1 group compared with control (219±32 units/mm 2 vs 1185±97 units/mm 2 , respectively, p<0.0001) ( Fig 8 ).

There was a strong trend toward reduced basal MSNA following caloric restriction alone (normcaloric vs. hypocaloric: 22±3 vs. 14±4 burst/min, p = 0.06).

As a result, there was a moderately significant difference in a guild’s average movement in changing landscapes (marginal effect of guild in changing landscapes P = 0.06; Fig 3 ; median values provided in S1 Table , full results in S6 Table ).

More interestingly, we identified a significant difference in the intermediate bacterial population based on Simpson index (p = 0.03) and a trend toward significance based on Shannon index (p = 0.06) ( Table 1 ).

The main within person effect for time outdoors in the morning approached significance in predicting Total Sleep Time ( p = 0.06) after adjusting for time outdoors in the afternoon.

It was also increased with increasing age (p = 0.0006), especially up until the age of 30 years, and in those with a visible BCG scar, although this was of borderline significance (p = 0.06).

Similar to miR-149, miR-202 expression at baseline was lowest in the ozone + in vivo LPS group, with exposure-dependent effects that were near statistical significance ( Figure 5B ; two-way ANOVA for in vivo exposure and in vitro LPS treatment; p = 0.06 for exposure and p = 0.04 for LPS). miR-202 decreased with in vitro LPS treatment compared to baseline values except in cultures with a history of ozone exposure ( p = 0.06 for ozone alone, p = 0.002 for ozone + in vivo LPS).

When we defined the presence of a BCG scar strictly and excluded those with scar “unknown/not sure” and repeated the Cox regression (N = 4061), BCG scar and QFT were both only of borderline significance, hazard ratios 1.7 (95% CI 0.9–3.2, p = 0.06) and 1.7 (95% CI 1.0–2.9, p = 0.07) respectively while maternal education of primary school or less or unknown remained significant at hazard ratio 1.4 (95% CI 1.0–1.9, p = 0.04).

The results revealed a marginally significant main effect of modality order, F (1, 16) = 4.16, p = .06, η p 2 = .21.

Women in Poland and Greece appeared less likely, while women in Ireland were more likely, to meet the WHO PA recommendations (borderline significance: p = 0.06 and p = 0.1, respectively; Fig 2 and S2 Table ). 30 min · d −1 PA recommendation When PA guidelines were defined as at least 3 0 min · d −1 of MVPA [ 5 ], prevalence estimates of meeting these guidelines were lower and ranged from 27.1% (Greece) to 46% (UK) for men and from 10.4% (Greece) to 25.6% (Ireland) for women.

The effect was marginally significant (F (2, 39) = 2.92, p = 0.06, η 2 PARTIAL = 0.136) with participants in the deviant condition reporting significantly (Sidak post-hoc test) higher SBP levels (M = 111.5) than the two normative conditions (respectively: M(normative1) = 109.2; M(normative2) = 108.2).

Spatial position (right/left) presented a marginally significant effect ( F (1,33) = 3.63, p = 0.06, η 2 = 0.1), right spatial position tending to be associated with shorter response times.

Result Pretreatment prior to lysis showed a trend toward improving DNA extraction efficiency (paired t-test, P = 0.06; Fig 1A ).

Up284 significantly reduced tumor burden (p = 0.002) and showed a trend for prolonged survival compared to vehicle treated group (p = 0.06) ( Fig 6D–6F ).

The PFI 50 was significantly higher in non-transmitter women during the first month after onset and close to significance (P = 0.06) in the second month after onset ( Fig. 7D ).

The association between omentin-1 plasma levels and early deceleration peak was borderline significant in this analysis (β = 0.233; P = 0.06).

Of note, we report a borderline significant negative correlation between baseline coenzyme Q10 levels and baseline irisin (R = –0.22, P = 0.06).

The second organizational variable (type of ward) just failed to reach significance (p = 0.060).

In addition, when the models were adjusted for each of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors not influenced by treatment (age, ethnicity, smoking and diabetes) instead of the Framingham score, and also for the antiretroviral regimen composition (protease inhibitors vs non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors), high seropositivity for varicella-zoster virus remained associated with carotid atherosclerosis (OR [95% CI] 5.27 [1.55–17.95], P = 0.008), and high seropositivity for cytomegalovirus was very close to significance (OR [95% CI] 3.27 [0.95–11.20], P = 0.06).

Pairwise contrasts revealed this effect was largely attributable to larger WM capacity in musicians relative to nonmusicians ( p <0.01) and a marginally significant effect between M and C ( p = 0.06).