Excerpts

Please remark how the continuous NRI achieved near significance (0.085; P = 0.06), providing further evidence of the value of OPN when estimating risk for the composite event.

An interaction term approached significance ( P = 0.06) in the full model, but the corresponding main effect of treatment was noticeably not associated in this modeling scenario ( P = 0.16).

Nonetheless, this continuous development of DRMs in patients starting ART since 2007 sets NNRTI apart from the other historical drug classes, where there is a decreasing trend; PI resistance for group IV in 2011 was significantly lower than expected (P = 0.04, chi-square test), and the same trend was seen for NRTI, although with borderline significance (P = 0.06, chi-square test).

But the slight reduction of HDMBOA-Glc in stems at 2x[CO 2 ]+H 2 O was only marginally significant ( P = 0.06) in comparison to concentrations 1x[CO 2 ]+H 2 O using the Tukey-Kramer test.

In DO mice, there was a trend toward significance for the interaction between all three factors (stress × sex × stimuli, F(1,95)=3.62, p = .06) because MSEW females spent less time in the zones that had been paired with social stimuli compared to other groups.

Besides the marginally significant correlation between NAWM-AD and Tinetti score (p = 0.06), we observed no significant association between changes in the global diffusion indices of NAWM and Walk Time or Tinetti score.

Although not quite significant (p = 0.06), cricket-fed spiders had the lowest MiSp relative to actin ( Fig 2D ).

In this larger cohort, the response to female bedding approached significance (F 1, 12 = 4.40, p = 0.060), with TBI mice again tending to produce shorter calls compared to sham animals.

Overall, the correlation was not quite significant (Spearmann’s rho = −0.33, p = 0.06), though the correlation for warm stimulation was significant (rho = −0.655, p = 0.034).

Analyses of the lifetime paracetamol dose variable revealed significant dose dependent associations for all symptom outcomes (p<0.01) and a borderline significant association for sensitization (p = 0.06).

In the second session, we observed a nearly significant relation between Stimulus Intensity, Attention Condition and Individual Training Time for the post-post2 group, F (1,11) = 4.4, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.28, but we found no relation between Individual Training Time and Stimulus Intensity when separate tests were performed per attention condition ( p > 0.35).

Among the RD1 responders, the proportion of EM cells was almost significantly higher in BALC (96%) than in PB samples (88%) (p = 0.06).

However, there was weak evidence of a decreasing trend in annual incidence among AGYW aged 15–20 years from 2011 to 2015 (RR for linear trend from one year to the next = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.87–1.00, p = 0.06; S1 Table and S1 Fig ).

S1b ), and an Anova of log-transformed data indicated only marginal significance (p = 0.06; note that this test ignores phylogenetic relatedness and is therefore only approximate).

FD mice gained 18% more weight with a marginal significance ( p = 0.06) in accordance with a previous study [65] .

The personal importance participants attached to rationality (IRS) had only a marginally significant effect on willingness to volunteer, b = 0.27, SE = 0.15, t (281) = 1.86, p = .06.

In the East (existing motorway) area, a borderline significant (p = 0.06) interaction with chronic condition was found for mental wellbeing (MCS-8).

In addition, when the models were adjusted for each of the traditional cardiovascular risk factors not influenced by treatment (age, ethnicity, smoking and diabetes) instead of the Framingham score, and also for the antiretroviral regimen composition (protease inhibitors vs non nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors), high seropositivity for varicella-zoster virus remained associated with carotid atherosclerosis (OR [95% CI] 5.27 [1.55–17.95], P = 0.008), and high seropositivity for cytomegalovirus was very close to significance (OR [95% CI] 3.27 [0.95–11.20], P = 0.06).

Furthermore the Face x Sentence x Age interaction was marginally significant ( p = .06, cf. the blue bars in Fig. 6 ): In the negative sentence conditions, the negative (vs. positive) face did not appear to affect accuracy in the young group ( M = .88, SE = 0.03 vs.

It should be noted, however, that at the 2 min time point, means of salivary acetaldehyde between the groups showed a near-significant difference (p=0.06) which may become significant should the number of study subjects be considerably higher.

From 0.5 till 3.5 minutes after extra long pre-exposure (4.3 minutes) the predominance of the alternative percept was significantly larger than the baseline measure (time-bins 2-5 and 7: all t>3.0, all p<0.05; time-bin 6 was marginally significant: t = 2.2, p = 0.06).

Given this, 31.1% of the respondents are considering using the project data for research purposes and 33.0% consider MIPP/InNat data as a useful tool to identify suitable sites where they may observe or photograph the target species (instrumental interest) with a barely significant difference between classes, respectively 27.7% for CV and 34.8% for NCV (X 2 = 7.40; p = 0.060) and a weak association between classes and instrumental interest (Tau-b = 0.120; p = 0.013).

The interaction between the ISI and Group factors tended towards significance (F(1,18) = 4.2, p<0.06).

Error rate Image generation accuracy increased with age, F (4, 97) = 3.35, p = .013, ηp 2 = .12, where both 4- ( M = .69, p = .06 marginally significant) and 8-year-olds ( M = .68, p = .02) differed from adults ( M = .82).

However, Egger’s regression tests were borderline significant for results regarding both the amplitude ( p = 0.06) and latency of the N100 component ( p = 0.10) (Section 5 in S1 Appendix ).