Excerpts

Interestingly, MHO women self-reported approximately 2 hours less total sitting time compared to MUO women and this difference approached significance (p = 0.06).

Although the Group × Training interaction was only marginally significant [ F (2, 24) = 3.17, MSE = 0.002, p = 0.06], t -test analysis demonstrated that both motor groups (QMT and SMT) significantly improved in speed [ t (8) = 3.26 and 2.99, p <0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.59 and 1.25, respectively], see Figure 3B . 3.2.

The three-way interaction between exposure frequency * stimulus category * complexity showed a trend towards significance, F (2, 16) = 3.16, p = .06, η p 2 = .28, marginal trend, indicating a similar pattern as in Experiment 1.

The association between iron supplementation and decreased risk of cardiovascular or sepsis-related mortality was of borderline significance [HR (95% CI): 0.31 (0.09–1.04); p = 0.06] ( Table 2 ).

Face memory performance showed a trend of a negative correlation with autism severity, r = −.277, df = 45, p = .060 indicating better face memory performance in less severely affected children.

The concomitant decrease of state 3 respiration in striatum just failed to reach significance (p = 0.06 with Mann and Whitney test) ( Figure 2B ).

A trend towards significance was found for the Time × Group interaction [ F (15,570) = 1.635, p = 0.060] in which performance of the randomized practice group showed a less stable pattern along time with higher error peaks during practice (especially on TR5 and TR10, which was the start of training day 2 en 3 respectively for the randomized practice group) compared to the blocked practice group ( Figure 5 ).

A positive and marginally significant relation was found between such collaboration and sense of coherence within a community (β = 0.137, p = 0.06), social capital (β = 0.119, p = 0.08), and perceived benefits (β = 0.116, p = 0.09).

Looking time at face The regression model predicting the difference in looking time at the actor’s face from before to after the ball was stolen approached significance, F (5, 45) = 2.33, p = .06, adj.

As expected, there was a significant main effect of stimulus intensity with higher intensities eliciting higher MEP amplitudes [ F (1, 56) = 44.07, p <001] and a marginally significant effect for time [ F (1, 28) = 3.07, p = 06].

There was a moderately significant interaction (P = 0.06) between sex and treatment with males injected with the virus-positive filtrate surviving several days longer than females (see Figure 3 ).

It should be noted, however, that at the 2 min time point, means of salivary acetaldehyde between the groups showed a near-significant difference (p=0.06) which may become significant should the number of study subjects be considerably higher.

The only significant predictors of eating category was food fussiness (b = −1.04 (0.50), Z = −2.09, p = 0.04), although age approached significance (b = −0.72 (0.39) Z = −1.85, p = 0.06).

Those aged >45 years also tended to have raised levels of CSF 8-OHdG, a marker of oxidative DNA damage, although this did not quite reach statistical significance (p = 0.06) ( Table 1 ).

However, this association was not strictly significant (p = 0.06).

gattii , with a trend towards significance for TNF-α ( P = 0.06).

Interestingly, when verbal ability was included in the models, the beta for the GET became nearly significant, β = .157, p = .060, whereas the beta for the ET became non-significant, β = .061, p = .508, revealing that, when verbal ability is controlled for, the GET is correlated with age whereas the ET is not.

Training duration also predicted some of the distant outcomes: Vocabulary (partial r 2 = .09, p = .02) and Raven's Advanced PM, although only at a near-significant level (partial r 2 = .06, p = .06).

The effect of ROI was near significance ( F 2, 17 = 2.991, P = .06), with the highest activity within the dACC ( Fig. 7E ).

Studies in which more than 50% of participants were in contact with patients with COVID-19 demonstrated a higher prevalence of anxiety (25.7%; 95% CI, 17.4%-34.9%), compared to studies in which 50% or fewer participants were in contact (17.4%; 14.5%-20.4%), although evidence of this difference was of borderline significance ( p = 0.06).

This analysis revealed a significant block × site interaction (p<0.01, F 4,5 = 5.41), Site showed a significant effect on sensation of movement (p<0.001, F 4,5 = 12.86) and sensory block showed a trend on sensation of movement (p<0.06, F 1,5 = 5.10).

Visual inspection of the graphs plotting latency to sing against the concentration of testosterone suggested a trend in females, but the correlation just failed to be significant (Pearson's correlation test: r = −0.65, N = 9, p = 0.06; Fig. 5 ).

However, there was a significant negative correlation between vendace pelagic CPUE and condition factor residuals in DR-whitefish one year later (r Pearson = 0.51, P = 0.026), a nearly significant negative correlation between vendace CPUE and vendace condition factor residuals the year after (r Pearson = 0.44, P = 0.060), but no correlation between vendace CPUE and SR whitefish condition factor residuals (r Pearson = 0.12, P = 0.81).

This item type effect was qualified by an interaction with culture, F (1.42, 196.73) = 3.45, MSE = 0.06, p < .05, η 2 = 0.02; and a marginally significant 3-way interaction, F (1.42, 196.73) = 3.24, MSE = 0.06, p = .06, η 2 = 0.02.

For Lilium ‘Sorbonne’, both factors, “Sample type” and “Day” in the vase affected bacterial compositions, although the interaction of type and day only bordered on significant ( p = 0.06). “Day” explained more variation in bacterial compositional change than “Sample type” based on R 2 value.