2 ), and the difference in δ 13 C of vane and rachis samples taken from broad-billed prions bordered on significant ( χ 2 = 3.84, P = 0.050).
← all phrases
“bordered on significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The decreases in disulfide bond content following the 3 -min delays to freezing were statistically significant for total protein (22%) and for alpha-enolase (40%) and bordered on significant for CKB (40%; P = 0.052).
The relative differences in the slopes of residual γH2AX versus dose for acute versus prolonged irradiation bordered on significant (p = 0.055), and the magnitude of the change was consistent with the observed increase in surviving fraction.
Age bordered on significant at a 5% level ( p = 0.0556).
Though there was no significant difference between treatments in overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) across models, the difference in PFS bordered on significant in a multipredictor analysis (benefit in favour of cabozantinib; P = 0.06).
For Lilium ‘Sorbonne’, both factors, “Sample type” and “Day” in the vase affected bacterial compositions, although the interaction of type and day only bordered on significant ( p = 0.06). “Day” explained more variation in bacterial compositional change than “Sample type” based on R 2 value.
However, the association between the expression of NuSAP1 and breast cancer subtypes bordered on significant ( P = 0.063).
While the association between type of infection and ST bordered on significant (total inertia = 0.522, χ 2 = 65.84, P = 0.066), there was a significant association between type of infection and clonal complexes in each of three separate statistical analyses.
The expression of ΔNp63α and ABCG2 increased significantly ( p < 1 × 10 −7 and p < 1 × 10 −6 , respectively), whereas the expression of C/EBPδ increased but only bordered on significant ( p = .099).
The Egger regression of 25-OH vitamin D levels as an exposure for ET also bordered on significant in the study, suggesting (inconclusively) a mildly protective effect of vitamin D on ET.
We also found that differences in the expression of CCL5 bordered on significant with a p-value of 0.066.
Finally, there was a nonsignificant interaction (but the interaction bordered on significant; see Figures 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 and Table 10 ). 10 Based on hypotheses, we wanted to investigate how condition influenced win and loss feedback using a series of one‐way ANOVAs.
Notably, communication results only bordered on significant, which could mean that communication differences found in preschoolers in previous cross-sectional studies [ 38 ] were not maintained over time.
The p -value for the proportion of substitutions (0.056) bordered on significant.