Excerpts

Furthermore, maternal age had a borderline significance influence on the likelihood of a health facility delivery (AOR = 1.3; CI: 1.0–3.9; p = 0.056).

Results Tissue oxygenation For the mean Δ[HHb] from all conditions, sites and bouts combined, there was a main effect for site (p = 0.003, F = 7.493), with significant differences found between FH and VL sites (p = 0.025) and the difference between GN and VL sites approaching significance (p = 0.056).

Step time While there were no significant results for step time, a main effect of condition for step time variability was nearly significant (F(4,72) = 2.43, P = 0.056).

Post hoc paired samples T-tests showed that this bias was significant for numerosity 12 [ t (1,28) = −16,89, p <0.001], numerosity 28 [ t (1,28) = −2.77, p = 0.01], numerosity 36 [ t (1,28) = −2.71, p = 0.01] but marginally significant for numerosity 44 [ t (1,28) = −1,99, p = 0.056] and not significant for numerosity 20 [ t (1,28) = 0.2, p = 0.84].

d) Effects of toxoplasmosis on rated pleasantness of odors Repeated measure ANCOVA with attributed pleasantness of six odors (including the neutral sample) as repeated measures and toxoplasmosis, sex, Rh, intensity of smoking and age as an independent variables revealed only significant effects of sex (p = 0.009, η 2 = 0.059), type of odor (p < 0.0005, η 2 = 0.056), sex-type of odor interaction (p < 0.0005, η 2 = 0.060), and a nearly significant effect of smoking (p = 0.056, η 2 = 0.032), Fig 3 .

Besides, in multivariate analysis, ACT showed a marginally significant better survival, with HR of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.23–1.02, p = 0.056) and 0.56 (95% CI: 0.31–1.02, p = 0.056) in the discovery and validation datasets, respectively.

This mirrors its unadjusted OR of 7.37 (p < 0.001) and near-significant adjusted OR (2.84, p = 0.056), suggesting a potent synergistic effect between CACNA1D and CACNA1C , potentially due to their direct roles in calcium channel pharmacodynamics (Linde et al., 2012).

The annual injury incidence did not differ by family status except that the incidence was higher, with marginal significance, for children living with their father only than mother only (18.9% vs 13.5%, P = 0.056, Table 1 ).

The tgHD rats and WT rats shared similar total cholesterol levels, except for the 3-month tgHD rats, which showed a trend of reduction (p = 0.056, vs. 3-month WT).

5 , A2) 28 h after the fear conditioning both the lesion (F 1,20 = 8.1, P = 0.01) and the ATS (F 1,20 = 12.5, P = 0.002) had a significant reducing effect on the freezing time while their interaction only approached significance (F 1,20 = 4.1, P = 0.056).

HIV negative adults had higher eGFR than HIV positive adults with borderline significance when CG without body surface area adjustment was used (P = 0.056).

3 ; Table 2 ), while OS showed a marginally non-significant trend (F 1,308 = 3.68; p = 0.056; Table 2 ).

Both performances were significantly above the 0.50 chance level (for trials with G: t (11) = 25.72, p<0.0001; for trials with S: t (11) = 12.47, p<0.0001) and the difference between them was marginally significant ( t (11) = 2.13, p = 0.056).

A main effect on the threshold of significance was found for Epoch ( F (1, 45) = 3.858, p = .056), indicating that while all patients showed significant impairments for remote retrieval (AD, p = .001; bvFTD, p = .001; SD, p = .001), SD patients scored in line with Control performance for recent retrieval (SD, p = .279; AD, p = .001; bvFTD, p = .007).

A marginally significant correlation was found for nucleotide diversity between T0 and T1/T2 samples from each patient ( r = 0.396, P = 0.056).

Interaction of ethnicity and gender was borderline significant ( p = 0.056) in the diabetic nephropathy subgroup, but was significant ( p = 0.030) in the nondiabetic nephropathy subgroup.

Pairwise comparisons of studies assessing beliefs and studies assessing religious behaviors yielded marginally significant differences ( Q = 3.64, df = 1; p = .056).

In the second year a significant effect of the type of response was observed before the “ram effect” (p<0.03) and paired comparison showed that oestradiol concentration at -16h before the “ram effect” was significantly greater in the “precocious” group ( Fig 2C ; 2.61±1.27 versus 0.82±0.16 pg/mL; p<0.03) and approached significance at -8h (3.02±0.81 versus 1.30±0.35 pg/mL; p = 0.056).

The patients harboring c.3321delA (homozygous and heterozygous) displayed a trend of earlier age of onset (0.16 and 0.81 years, respectively) compared with the wild-type genotype (1.07 years), which although displayed no statistical significance but showed a trend among three groups ( P = 0.056) ( Table 4 ) .

The difference in d′ among the five groups who had to retain memory for some duration (12 hours or more) was marginally significant ( F (4,75) = 2.42, MS e = 0.242, p = 0.056), with the largest pairwise difference in d′ between the PM–AM and PM–PM groups ( Fig. 5A ).

Despite the relatively low event rates, the difference for stroke events almost reached statistical significance (p=0.056).

Improved removal of bacterial DNA as measured by the 16S rDNA assay was significant (P = 0.046) and the increased removal of viable Gram-negative bacteria as measured by growth of MAC medium approached significance (P = 0.056) ( Table 2A ).

This difference almost reached significance ( p = 0.056, see Table 1 ).

On the other hand, the HMOX1b haplotype showed a CM protective effect with marginal significance when comparing CM with UM patients (corrected P-value = 0.056).

Through multivariate analysis, overexpression of erbB2 and/or NFκB was identified as an independent risk factor for bladder cancer death with marginal significance (hazard ratio 21.5, P = 0.056) along with chemoradiation resistance ( P = 0.003) and hydronephrosis ( P = 0.018).