Excerpts

the naive juvenile in the vehicle condition approached significance (p = 0.054, Fig 2C ).

There was a significant increase in CMT values in diabetic patients with NPDR and a nearly significant increase (P = 0.054) in diabetic patients without DR at postoperative 1 month.

The 0.5 mg/kg dose exhibited a marginally significant increase in AUC glucose levels compared to controls (p = 0.054), while the 1, 2 and 6 mg/kg doses all evinced substantial increases in AUC values (p < 0.001); these effects were evident 15–30 minutes after the glucose challenge.

Physical function and maximal voluntary contraction In TS-HP, number of sit-to-stand repetitions in 30 s was 1.2±0.6 higher (borderline significant, P = 0.054) after the intervention compared to CON, with an increase (P = 0.01) of 1.6±0.6 in TS-LP ( Fig 2A ).

For the experiment in which we manipulated thymol concentration, we found no significant effect of any thymol concentration on Crithidia load, but moderate (2 ppm) thymol concentrations incurred a near-significant increase in mortality ( P = 0.054).

Yet despite these differences in mean contribution by sleep condition, the standard deviations were high enough that the difference was not significant (two tailed p = .303), though marginally significant with cohort 1 included ( p = .054).

More detailed evaluation showed a trend toward reduced trabecular thickness ( P = 0.054, Fig 5K ), and a decrease in trabecular number and increase in trabecular separation in CRI ( Fig 5L–5M ).

This difference remained after adjustment for age and BMI, and became borderline significant after further adjustment for fat mass ( Table 5 , p = 0.054).

This trend was borderline significant in the fourth line (H322M 2.5 , p=0.054).

However, there was a marginally significant association between PIQ and recognition memory performance in the DD group ( r = .594, p = .054), confirming the desirability to control for PIQ in the group comparison of recognition memory.

While the AERP exhibited a decreasing trend compared the CRAP+RSD group with the sham-operated group, the probability value was not significantly different (p = 0.054).

The age x treatment interaction for the 19.30–20.30 interval just missed significance (F (3,21) = 4.151, p = 0.054).

Pair-wise tests revealed significant differences between pH profiles of acidified and control treatments in permeable sediments (p<0.05), and a marginally significant difference (p = 0.054) between pH profiles of acidified and control treatments in April.

The difference in baseline mean cortical bone mineral density was nearing significance with p = 0.054.

A non-parametric independent-samples Kruskal-Wallis test (essentially a non-parametric one-way ANOVA) was marginally significant at the omnibus level for publications with undergraduates in general, H (4) = 9.28, p = .054, and significant at the omnibus level for publications with undergraduates as first author, H (4) = 12.24, p = .02.

Of the serious tumors, DNMT3a protein expression was significantly higher than that in benign tumor samples ( P = 0.001); DNMT3b was marginally significant down regulated in ovarian cancers compared to that of the benign tumors ( P = 0.054); DNMT1 expression has no statistical difference between ovarian cancers and benign tumor tissues ( P = 0.837).

During the 10 th cycle of DSS administration, group 2B showed significantly lower values than group C, but also group 2BP had a reduced level that was close to significance (P = 0.054) ( Fig. 2 ).

Activity in the caudate ROI for the modeling of surprise (as defined by information theory) during the observation of unpredictables approached significance at p = .054 (t = 2.98;t crit 5% = 3.00; t crit 10% = 2.73, p<0.1) 2.5 Orthogonal modeling results Modeling entropy yielded replication of the former significant result for the hippocampus ROI during the observation of unpredictables (t = 1.83; t crit 5% = 1.50).

A marginally significant interaction between block and target size, F (1.83, 22.01) = 3.43, p = .054, η 2 = .22, reflects the differential improvements over blocks in verification time across target size.

Pairwise contrasts revealed that the difference in risk-taking between gains and losses at the intermediate ($4.50) payoff variability level was marginally nonsignificant, t (39) = 1.98, p = .054, d = .31.

In this case, the phenotype would be caused by increased PKA-C3 inhibition due to the excess of binding-competent SWS (we previously showed that increased SWS expression reduced PKA activity though the effect was not quite statistically significant with a value of p = 0.054; [24] ).

The model was marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.16; F 3,42 = 2.76, p = 0.054, f 2 = 0.20) and the factor EC remained a significant predictor of the behavioral index ( β = 0.40, F 1,42 = 7.49, p = 0.009, η p 2 = 0.15).

One exception was the 3 h post-dose sample for subject 5, where the decrease in HIV-1 inhibition observed in the presence of seminal plasma tended towards significance (p = 0.054, n = 3, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and was minimal in the context of this type of biological assay (average decrease of 4.5%) ( Figure 4C ).

We observed a statistical trend (p = 0.0540) suggesting higher stimulus-evoked correlation map similarity for within stimulus comparisons as opposed to comparisons between the two different 10 oscillation stimuli ( Fig 5D ).

This difference was nearly significant (p = 0.054, Mann-Whitney U test).