Excerpts

Pairwise t-tests in the item analysis showed that the N+P- condition elicited significantly higher error rates than the N-P- condition (t 2 (38) = 2.73, p = .009), but the difference to the N-P+ condition was only marginally significant (t 2 (38) = 1.99, p = .053).

Among the native species, biomass ranked big bluestem > switchgrass > little bluestem at first harvest and the size difference between the two bluestems was marginally significant (Tukey HSD p = 0.053).

This difference between groups was marginally statistically significant; mothers in the LNS group were approximately 6% more likely (p = 0.053) than mothers in the non-LNS group to report introducing complementary foods at six months of age.

The only marginally significant post hoc comparison was between the responsibility ( M = 5.66, SD = 1.03) and control conditions (control M = 5.21, SD = 1.04; blame M = 5.43, SD = 1.06), p = .053.

Although a follow-up three (TDM category) by two (measure of Benevolence) ANOVA did not produce a significant interaction of category and measure, F (2,1643) = 2.36, p = .094, another analysis limited to individualists and competitors did find a near-significant interaction of category and measure, F (1,500) = 3.77, p = .053.

The pathway most affected by BPA is “RAN Signaling” with only borderline significance ( P = 0.0531).

During reversal (R), 2 months old WT and TG have a learning index above the chance level of 0.5, although both groups did only reach a statistical trend (p value between 0.05 and 0.1; 2 months: WT, t = 2.126 and P = 0.0532; TG, t = 1.884, and P = 0.0805).

The tax was associated with a marginally significant negative trend in initiation for young adults (p = .0532) [ 63 ].

Analysis of the different BRAFV600 mutation types (n = 249) found that BRAFV600E was significantly influenced by center (p = 0.0020) and gender (p = 0.0386), while location of sample had borderline significance (p = 0.0532).

In our work, the dephosphorilation rate (k 4 ) in situ inflammation group is almost significantly higher than that in tumor group ( p = 0.0532) with even the small number of samples used in our study.

The only gene tested with a significant difference between SUV39H1-overexpressing and control tumors was cyclin B1 (ccnb1, p = 0.0035), though SUV39H1 was nearly significant, as expected (p = 0.0533).

Perivascular stranding and anal sphincter invasion were statistically significant for liver metastasis (p = 0.0077 and p = 0.0471), while extramural vascular invasion based on MRI (mrEMVI) was marginally significant (p = 0.0534).

The magnitude of the decrease, however, was different depending on whether the neighbouring pair had reproduced successfully or not: unsuccessful females that had observed another unsuccessful pair decreased their preference for their breeding partner by only 8.0%, which is not significantly different from zero (unilateral t-test: t 5 = 0.134, P = 0.134), whereas, unsuccessful females whose neighbours had reproduced successfully spent 42.5% more time with the neighbouring male after reproducing, which is a marginally significant change (unilateral t-test: t 5 = 2.284, P = 0.0534).

In the IT dataset, average gains were higher at +1.1% AUC yet marginally significant ( P = 0.0535).

Retinol concentration exhibited a decreasing trend across pregnancy although the changes were marginally significant [β: -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.01–0.00; p -value = 0.0535] ( Fig 2A ).

In the pellet consumption tests, BACHD rats now needed a similar amount of time to consume the reward pellets, although there was a borderline significant trend towards BACHD rats needing more time (p = 0.0535).

L-TGA patients had somewhat lower nNO (223±102nl/min) as compared to D-TGA (263±93nl/min) that bordered on being significant (p = 0.0536; Table 1 ).

Two other factors were nearly significant: Outdoor Space Experience (P = 0.0537; negative) and Percent Time Housed Separately (P = 0.0549; positive).

Table 2 shows that frequency of hospitalisation, colon at diagnosis and colon at follow-up were nearly significant based on Fisher’s exact test (p = 0.0538, p = 0.0719 and p = 0.0670, respectively).

When the analysis focused on H63D homozygotes compared to WT HFE patients, the survival difference was marginally significant (p = 0.0539) ( S4A Fig ).

Further, post-hoc pairwise comparisons with paired t-test showed a near-significant difference between objects and meaningless objects conditions in 500–1000 ms time window (t(10) = 2.183; p = 0.054).

Suc→Lac→H 2 O) showed that the main effect of condition was just short of significance (F (1,21) = 4.17, p = 0.054), and that there was no condition x trial interaction (F (3,63) = 1.37, p = 0.26).

Clinically, patients with GOF mutations showed a higher frequency of platinum resistance (22/58, 37.9%) than patients with NE-GOF mutations (12/56, 21.4%), and a lower frequency of platinum sensitivity (36/58, 62.1%) than patients with NE-GOF mutations (44/56, 78.6%), although this was marginally significant ( p =0.054) ( Figure 3A ).

Here, MCH levels in CSFs from orexin-deficient narcolepsy children showed a trend towards higher levels (p = 0.054) than in CSFs from orexin-normal children, although raised levels were not previously found in 14 patients with narcolepsy [ 25 ].

MCH levels in CSF CSF MCH levels were only measured in eight patients, and were variable but with a clear trend towards higher values in the orexin negative narcolepsy CSFs compared with orexin normal non-narcolepsy paediatric CSFs (p = 0.054, Student’s unpaired t-test; Fig 2B , Table 1 ) or adult normal CSFs tested in parallel (data not shown).