Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

The exception to this was for the Conduct Problems sub-scale of the SDQ, where behavioural problems were reduced, as expected, in the extended-intervention group compared with the minimal-intervention group, although that difference fell just short of statistical significance ( t (62) = 1.980, p = .052).
near significanceP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Vocal and color signals The probability of emitting estrus calls was associated with reproductive status (LRT: X 2 = 13.33, Δdf = 4, P = 0.001, see Table C in S1 File for further details), decreasing significantly between the pre-conceptive period and the first month of pregnancy (GLMM: z = -3.19, P = 0.001, Fig 2B ), and then increasing again to near significance from the first to the second month of pregnancy (GLMM: z = 1.94, P = 0.052, Fig 2B , see Table D in S1 File for further details).
marginally significantP = 0.0521.0× alphagold
The adjusted effect of malaria infection on the difference in eosinophils (P = 0.01), basophils (P<0.001), red blood cells (P<0.001) and hematocrit (P<0.001) was significant, while it was marginally significant on lymphocytes (P = 0.052), with infection being associated with a greater drop in all the above mentioned cell numbers.
approached significancep = .0521.0× alpha
( Fig 2 ) The main effect of perceptual load approached significance [F(2,56) = 3.12, p = .052; partial η 2 = .100]; however, the SOA by perceptual load interaction was significant [F(28,784) = 3.79, p < .001; partial η 2 = .119], indicating that perceptual load did alter percent flash reports more strongly at particular SOAs.
nearly significantp = 0.0521.0× alphagold
Among T-implanted females, there was no detectable correlation between plasma T levels and the number of days elapsed since implantation (Pearson’s r = −0.27, n = 10, p = 0.44), and there was a nearly significant positive correlation between female aggression score and the number of days elapsed since implantation (Pearson’s r = 0.55, n = 13, p = 0.052), suggesting that, if anything, the behavioral effect of the T implant increased over time, rather than decreased.