Excerpts

Concerning non-responses , the main effect of Time-point was significant, F (1,18) = 22.55; p = 0.0001; μ 2 = 0.556, whereas the Group x Time-point interaction was marginally significant, F (1,18) = 4.38; p = 0.051; μ 2 = 0.195.

In functional unit 2 the proportion of resistant pathogens reduces non-significantly by − 0.007 (− 0.015; 7.1 e − 05) per year, however, at the edge of significance ( p = 0.051).

However, the results obtained for the SK-OV-3 cell line were only marginally significant (p = 0.051), probably due to the low number of samples (three).

Regarding nationality, non-Saudis (52%) use specific services more frequently than Saudis (40%), but this difference is only marginally significant ( P = 0.051).

Non-PH controls showed a borderline significant association of Ang-1 with cardiac index (r = 0.307, p = 0.051), but no significant associations with other baseline parameters were evident ( Fig 5 ).

This analysis revealed essentially the same pattern of effects as the RT ANOVA: a significant validity effect, F (2, 23) = 34.130, p < .001, η p 2 = .597, and a marginally significant interaction, F (2, 46) = 3.172, p = .051, η p 2 = .121.

A statistical analysis was performed to compare the frequency of CDH23 mutation between the adult and pediatric hearing loss cohorts; a difference was shown with marginal significance ( p = 0.051 by Fischer’s exact test).

Statistical analysis revealed that whilst the abundance of most bacterial DNA, at different taxonomic levels, was unaffected by disease status, the abundance of Raoultella was borderline significant (P = 0.051) and observed as the almost exclusive presence of this organism’s DNA in the synovial fluid of RA patients only ( Fig 3 ).

The interaction between Emotion and Age was nearly significant, F(3.84, 146.06)=2.451, p= 0.051, η 2 p =.06.

This means that a strongly nonsignificant p -value is equally likely to be treated by publication selection bias and dropped with an equal probability in the case of publication bias as it is in the case of p-hacking (e.g., borderline significant results, p = 0.051 or far off p = 0.9).

Age was significant (F 1,34 = 233.2, p<0.0001), while sex was marginally significant (F 1, 148 = 3.86, p = 0.0512).

In contrast, MG1655 vaginal wash titers and uterine histology scores suggest a different relationship in which higher bacterial numbers were seen alongside higher uterine inflammatory scores, but a positive correlation did not quite reach statistical significance ( P = 0.0512) ( Fig 7F ).

If we regress ED against the numbers of shared TEs by themselves the model is nearly significant (p = 0.0512), but this seems to be due solely to the SINEs in 3′UTS (0–2 kb) term, since removing this eliminates any hint of significance.

For NF-L, there was a trend towards significance for dissemination in space (p=0.0512).

A two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a trend towards a significant interaction (p = 0.0514) between island composition (sucrose versus no sucrose) and egg-laying zone, suggesting that the presence or absence of a sucrose island influences the distribution of egg laying across the plates.

Moreover, in men the number of the partners and the frequency of intercourse tend to affect oral HPV-infection (p = 0.0514 and 0.08, respectively: approaching significance).

We noted, however, that the survival difference between mesenchymal and proneural tumors in the (relatively small) training dataset is nearly significant (p=0.0514, Figure S8B in File S1), suggesting that statistical significance could be reached with a larger patient cohort.

The main effect of order was marginally significant, coeff = -0.6625, se = 0.3377, t = -1.9618, p = .0514, 95% CI [—1.3292, 0.0041].

When analysed according to HIV status, HIV- women who delivered preterm showed a trend for lower γδ T cell frequencies than HIV- women who delivered at term and this was particularly evident in the first trimester (p = 0.0515) ( Fig 4F and 4G ). γδ T cell frequencies were also lower in the first trimester in HIV+ women who delivered preterm compared to HIV+ women who delivered at term, but this difference was not statistically significant ( Fig 4F ).

This co-treatment significantly decreased ADM2 expression versus UK-5099 alone within the matrix, and also led to a marginally significant decrease ( p = 0.0516 ) within the bulge ( Fig 3D and S9A Fig in S1 File ), consistent with previous findings [ 35 ].

In CBDB/NIMH (Clinical Brain Disorders Branch/National Institute of Mental Health Sibling Study) sample (n = 188), rs3916441 also showed a trend of association (p = 0.0516) ( Table 1 ).

The three patients with non-significant difference from the healthy control group were the LIS patient (which was expected to have normal ICD since his consciousness level is identical to a healthy control), one Coma patient (which showed a trend towards significance, p = .0517) and one VS patient (which would be expected to have decreased correlation values).

However, according to the Mitchell-Olds & Shaw test none of the polynomial relationships were significantly hump-shaped or U-shaped, although for LAI the relationship was marginally significant (F = 4.47, p = 0.0517).

Pre-treatment with T increased IL8 production in response to MDP, which was reduced by TC and TCN but did not quite reach significance (Friedman test p = 0.0517, figure 6B ).

Physical activity at work predicted LGI among men with borderline significance only (OR = 1.22, CI = 1.00–1.49, p = 0.052).