Excerpts

In addition, the LAARP approach had less postoperative complications compared with PSARP, with a marginally significant difference (RR 0.66, 95%CI 0.44–0.99; P = 0.05).

The interactive effects of elevated [CO 2 ] and irrigation were highly significant in leaf area ( P <0.05; Table 4 ) and aboveground biomass ( P <0.05; Table 4 ).

However, it had marginally significant (at p < .05) effects on the random slope of political participation for perceived social support and loneliness, and these effects went in substantively opposite directions.

Layoff survivors were more likely than reemployed to feel that they could influence how the downsizing was carried out; the association was nearly significant (OR = 1.96, p = 0.050).

When comparing AT and UC groups at 9-month follow-up, the mean difference was approaching significance, -1.05m/sec (95%CI -2.11 to 0.017, p = 0.05).

The interaction term was marginally significant t (1) = 1.94, p = .05, suggesting the difference in abstraction between cohorts is greater at higher levels of the intercept, although this effect was not predicted and should be interpreted accordingly.

To reduce the multiple testing burden, candidate TFs were tested for interaction with a given gene only if their marginal association with the target probe set was nominally significant ( p <0.05).

In both genotypes, these epoxides had a decreasing trend in response to ischemia that was not statistically significant ( P > 0.05; Fig 7A ).

However, patients with PD showed increased RD values compared to HC subjects with a trend level of significance ( p = 0.05 TFCE-corrected), located in clusters including the anterior corona radiata (frontal lobe WM), genu of the corpus callosum, and body of the corpus callosum in the left hemisphere, and the frontal WM in the right hemisphere.

All tests were two sided with p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant, p-value < 0.001 was considered statistically highly significant, p-value ≥ 0.05 was considered statistically insignificant.

The downregulation of miR-181b expression between post- and 60 min post-exercise showed marginal significance (fold change = 0.84, P = 0.05) and paralleled significant upregulation of potential target TERT transcript (fold change = 14.75, P <0.05).

Expression increases in miR-186 from post- to 60 min post-exercise (fold change = 1.58, P <0.001) paralleled a significant upregulation of SIRT6 mRNA (fold change = 1.66, P <0.05), a significant downregulation of TERF2IP mRNA (fold change = 0.54, P <0.01) and a strong trend towards significance for RAD50 (fold change = 0.76, P = 0.05).

Twenty-three out of 39 SNPs were at least nominally significant (p<0.05) in the current study; all 23 had directions of effect consistent with the previous reports.

Fruit tissue firmness, length, dry weight, and fresh weight of fruit had a decreasing trend (p<0.05) during the irrigation cycle every 5 days compared to the irrigation cycle every 3 days.

A weakly significant difference (p≤0.05) of last single rupture forces was recorded between 0 s and 5 s contact time and a strongly significant difference (p≤0.001) between 0 s and 10 s contact time.

Manual forward selection, starting with variables that were more strongly associated with prevalence in univariable analyses, was applied and variables were retained in the multivariable model if p<0.2.The variables that were highly significant (p<0.05) in multivariable meta-regression model were considered as building blocks for interaction terms.

Moreover, the larger distance of the household living place from the university area echoes decreases urban expansion by 0.046, which is statistically highly significant (p≤0.05).

1 , Panel B) [median: 2.220 (IQR: 0.908–3.647) vs 0.461 (IQR: 0.353–1.048); p = 0.0373], while between CC and CT groups a borderline significant difference was observed both at basal level ( Fig. 1 , Panel A) [median: 1.420 (IQR: 0.875–1.655) vs 0.676 (IQR: 0.468–1.137); p = 0.0500] and after exposure to IFN-alpha ( Fig. 1 , Panel B) [median values: 2.220 (IQR: 0.908–3.647) vs 0.840 (IQR: 0.397–1.599); p = 0.0500].

Intermittent opioid use appeared to be associated with decreased memory CD8+ T cells proportion (CD45RO+CD45RA- CD8+ T cells: adjusted mean difference [AMD] [95% CI] = -6.15 [-11.50, -0.79], p = 0.02) and borderline significant increased senescent T cells (%CD57+ of total CD28-CD8+ T cells (AMD [95% CI] = 7.70 [-0.06, 15.46], p = 0.05).

102 pg/ml, P = 0.011) with a trend toward significance at day 56 (52 vs. 87 pg/ml, P = 0.050) ( Fig 3A ).

The expression profile of NFE2L2 target genes ( Fig 4A ) demonstrates a majority of such genes to have highly significant differences in mean expression between MR and Control samples (adjusted p ≤ 0.05 for 18/21 genes) with moderate to large effect sizes (absolute fold-changes 2-fold or higher).

All dsRNA fragments ( Fig 4a ) gave highly significant (p < 0,05) down regulation of the target genes giving between 80% (for Lsal IR25a Fragment-1) and nearly 100% (for Lsal IR8a.1) reduction in mRNA levels ( Fig 4b ).

However, compared to the mono-group, the combo-group showed a trend toward earlier resolution of fever (p = 0.05 on day 2 and p = 0.06 on day 5, Table 2 ).

A marginally significant standardized regression coefficient of b = .362, t (28) = 2.05, p = .05, f = .388, indicated that there was an overall trend for an increase in performance during the memory training.

Highly significant downregulation ( P <0.05) of JAG1 was observed in a total of ten MRKHS patients (62.5%), while DLL1 expression was significantly deregulated in all patients (100%).