Excerpts

There was a trend towards increased FN at 12 hrs (p<0.06), but this did not reach statistical significance. *, p<0.05.

After pleasant picture presentation, a marginally significant decrease of the startle response was observed for val homozygotes dependent on an increase in CTQ scores ( β = −0.51, t = −2.16, p = 0.05), while no associations were observed for val/met ( β = 0.15, t = 0.97, p = 0.34) or met/met genotype carriers ( β = −0.21, t = −1.17, p = 0.25), respectively.

In general, the L * values showed a decreasing trend during the storage period for all samples (p<0.05).

Please rephrase L274 add “only” before the vastus medialis L289 why the result on the Fz site is considered as “marginally significant trend” (p=0.05), whereas in the previous paragraph the result of RMS in BF was not (p=0.05)? ********** what does this mean? ).

Furthermore, one of our analyses displayed a strong trend (HbR by RT p = 0.05) and may be interpreted with caution.

Similarly, in the positive word condition beta values in the right dorsal MPFC were significantly higher in the LLS group than in the HLS group (t 38 = 2.15, p < 0.05), whereas in the negative word condition they were higher on a marginal significance in the HLS group than in the LLS group (t 38 = 2.01, p = 0.05).

Nevertheless, in statistical terms only observed heterozygosity was in fact significantly higher (Kolmogorov-Smirnoff test: p<0.01), all the other differences were either not or marginally significant (p<0.05).

Furthermore, the expression of HO-1 protein in the iAs, Mn, and iAs+Mn groups showed a trend similar to that of Nrf2 protein expression (p < 0.05, 0.01, 0.001; see S4 Table , panel B and Fig 4C ).

There was also a marginally significant effect for the interaction between Hemisphere and Condition (F(4,112) = 2, 458, p = .05).

The mean summary performance score did not vary significantly between urban and rural woredas (P-value = 0.87); however, compared with rural woredas, urban woredas had significantly higher rates of skilled birth attendance (50% versus 21%, P-value = 0.01) and higher proportions of households with latrines (81% versus 70%, with borderline significance P-value = 0.05).

There was a small and borderline significant main effect of Direction, F (1,35) = 4.3, p = .05, r 2 = .004, with difficulty ratings in INC blocks generally lower than in DEC blocks.

More specifically, out of 4,350,741 SNPs that indicated no heterogeneity between studies, those 185,986 SNPs that were nominally significant (p<0.05) and showed the same effect direction in all three studies were considered for the pathway enrichment analysis.

A near-significant reduction in GI bleeding was also observed (aHR 0.76, p=0.05).

A correlation analysis between slope and temperature did not show a significant trend in slope as a function of temperature (r = 0.73, P>0.05).

The data were considered significant and highly significant for P <0.05 and P <0.01, respectively.

BayeScan indicated highly significant probabilities for outlier candidate loci for balancing selection (negative alpha values) for all loci, with the exception of EJ35 ( P > 0.05) ( Table 4 ), but q values were under the 10% threshold for FDR (False Discovery Rate) correction.

Two other genes, 14-3-3 epsilon (at P7+1d and P7+7d) and FABP7 at P7+1d ( Figure 5 , Table 8 ) were approaching significance (p>0.05 to <0.10). 14-3-3 epsilon increased with a fold change of 1.3±0.1 at P7+1d and 3.1±0.8 at P7+7d compared to age-matched control.

There was a marginally significant main effect for the nap condition (F 1,47 = 3.99, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.08, figure 2b ) such that the nap participants correctly matched English meanings to more Chinese characters they had not previously seen.

Although a decreased anxiety level was also noticed in the group-based intervention method, the decrease narrowly failed to reach significance (p = 0.05).

There were no correlations with other leukocyte subsets present in the decidua, however when samples from women with PTLI were included, there were highly significant positive correlations between CCL4, CCL5, CXCL1, CXCL8 and CXCL10 and neutrophil numbers (p<0.05, Table 4 ).

For our replication of previously reported GWAS SNPs (identified mainly in populations of European ancestry) in our multi-ethnic population, we defined nominally significant as ‘p<0.05 and not corrected for multiple testing.’ Given the different recruitment and BP measurement in the Mt.

This difference was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.77, df = 1, P = 0.05).

Power to detect nominally significant evidence ( P ≤ 0.05) was low for all variants: 8%, for p.Val154Ile, 22% for p.Asp187His and 27% for p.Arg421Cys.

Xenografts expressing MTA1shRNA exhibited markedly reduced tumor growth at week 5 post-transplantation with marginal significance versus EV-Ctrl (p = 0.05).

There was a marginally significant interaction between culture and exposure duration, F(1,86) = 3.95, MSe = 3252.43, p = .05, η p 2 = .044.