Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

extremely significantP>0.051.0× alphaqualified
As can be seen in Table 4 , regression equation models of bowl hole molding rate Y 1 , relaxation density Y 2 and rupture-resisting strength Y 3 meet P<0.01, indicating that the model regression is extremely significant; If aberrant term of Y 1 , Y 2 and Y 3 meet P>0.05, indicating that the insufficient fit was not significant, and the regression equations have favorable fitting effect and practical analytical significance; The multiple correlation indices R 2 of Y 1 , Y 2 and Y 3 are 0.94, 0.96 and 0.94 respectively, which are all greater than 0.93, indicating that the models can explain more than 93% of response value changes, the predicted value is highly correlated to actual value and test error is small.
nominally significantp-value≤0.051.0× alphagold
In adenocarcinoma cases only (test for heterogeneity by histology: p heterog = 0.066), the minor allele of CYP1B1 rs10175368 was significantly protective for lung cancer (OR = 0.8, 95%CI = 0.69–0.93, p trend = 0.003) and a similar protective effect was nominally significant (i.e. p-value≤0.05) for the CYP1B1 rs9341266 polymorphism.
In five studies with low-priority scale, the results showed that the sexual function of the participants in the nursing intervention group was better than that in the control group, and the differences were very close to statistical significance (SMD = −0.72, 95% CI = [−1.43–−0.00], P = 0.05) ( Fig 4B ). 3.4.2.
borderline significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Secondary analyses Comparisons between individuals with high relative to low maternal cigarette consumption demonstrated a borderline significant reduction in second trimester BPD z score for the high compared to the low consumption group (four populations, mean reduction 0.09 [0, 0.19] p = 0.05) ( S3 Table ) and also for third trimester BPD z score (three populations, mean reduction 0.15 [0.03, 0.26] p = 0.01) and FL z score (three populations, mean reduction 0.17 [0.06, 0.28] p = 0.003), S4 Table .
a significant trendp <0.051.0× alphagold
Taking the differences clearly leads to mean and variance stationary data, as a comparison of the three left panels of Figure 2 (original data) with its three right ones (differenced data) shows: all statistical tests (slope tests, Levene-s tests) reveal that none of the differenced TS show either a significant trend ( p <0.05) or heteroscedasticity ( p >0.1).