Excerpts

When β > 0 and p < 0.01, it indicates a highly significant delay (extension); when 0.01 < p < 0.05, it indicates a significant delay (extension); and when 0.05 < p < 0.1, it indicates an insignificant delay (extension).

The results were highly significant in ACEA and ACNB treated groups (P < 0.05) at 1000 mg/kg, when compared with the diseased control group.

This function was moderately restored in HAART-treated HIV-1 + individuals (mean of 6.1±5.0%), although it did not reach statistical significance in comparison to viraemic patients (p = 0.05, Figure 3 B ).

Winter also resulted in a drastic change in the structure of communities making all of the indices highly significant (p < 0.05).

The current work has showed a trend towards a decrease in biogas formation rates with the 3 tested LCFAs compared to FOG (ANOVA and Tukey’s pairwise comparison, p<0.05) ( Fig 4 ), implying a higher inhibitory effect of LCFAs than FOG.

After adjustment for sex, BSA remained a significant correlate of LVEDID, LVEDL and LVEDV (p<0.01 for all), and also remained a borderline significant correlate of LV mass (p<0.05), but was no longer a correlate of LV end-diastolic external diameter.

Cytotoxicity was also trended greater against TMZ-resistant U373 with γδ TMZ-R as effectors as well when the assay was conducted in the presence of TMZ (p = .0875) but did not achieve significance at the p = 0.05 level.

However, there was an effect of attachment on the number of first pass regressions made out of the post-target region reliable by participants and very close to significance by items F 1(1, 52) = 7.22, p <.05, η 2 = .12; F 2(1, 15) = 4.10, p = .06, η 2 = .21.

However, baseline right hemisphere BA25 metabolism showed a marginally significant correlation with change from baseline MADRS, whereby higher baseline metabolism predicted better response to O/F therapy ( r = 0.68, P = .05).

After parental time with the child was added to model 2, its overall explanatory power had been increased to 2.2% ( p > 0.05), parental time with the child had a borderline significant impact on PCDI- comprehension ( β = 0.094, p = 0.05).

The relationship between number of lymph nodes retrieved and RFS was marginally significant (P = 0.05, Fig. 3 ).

P<0.01 was considered highly significant difference and P<0.05 significant difference from control.

Despite the higher hazard ratios, they did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.05).

However, an interesting trend was observed showing numerically higher expression level of brain orexin in T-NP and PP compared to the other groups ( p >0.05).

In terms of the latter aspect, these four genes are indeed significant as all of them achieved nominally significant (p < 0.05) or marginally significant (p < 0.10) p values in our discovery and replication datasets.

For the control group, no difference was found between the pre-measure and the half-way measure, and the pre-measure and the post-measure, p = .600, p = .608, respectively; the control group demonstrated a marginally significant improvement from the half-way measure to the post-measure, p = .050.

Repeated measures ANOVA showed within-subjects interactions of neuronal maturity (stages 1–3) and region (anterior or posterior) that were of borderline significance (F 2,4 = 3.3, p = 0.05).

Having a serious pregnancy complication is associated with higher quality of ANC, but this is only marginally significant (b = 0.22, p = 0.05).

By fitting a linear mixed-effects model, we identified a total of 497 genes with nominally significant difference (p< 0.05) in viral infection response between asthmatic and non-asthmatic groups ( S6 Dataset ).

S6 Dataset A list of 497 genes that showed marginally significant difference in viral induced gene expression changes between asthmatic between non-asthmatic ALI samples (nominal p <0.05).

Post-hoc main effects analyses indicated a marginally significant difference in TL change between women who were randomized ON versus OFF HT, for both APOE carrier (p<.05) and non-carrier (p<.05) groups.

A highly significant differentiation was observed within populations (F ST = 0.265, p = 0 < 0.05) ( Table 2 ).

Moreover, a borderline significant increase in favorable neurological outcome was observed for Pol-AED care (Pol-AED: 77.8% vs. non-Pol-AED: 74.0%; p = 0.050) (see Table 2 ).

There was a clear trend for an increase in mean overall performance (left panel) between testing at 7 months of age and 15 months of age which was significant for the control mice and the Swede mice (Spearman, 0.89≤ r s ≤0.94, p<0.05), but fell short of significance for the Tau mice (Spearman, r s = 0.66, p>0.05).

For SSRC, the test was barely significant (p-value ~ 0.05), suggesting that it suffers from a lack of power to detect a specific pattern for this parameter.