Excerpts

The environmental variables NDWI and NDVI were also included in the multivariate regression given their near significance ( p = 0.05).

Several mutated genes, CDKN2A, MET, KRAS, TP53, were nominally significant (p<0.05), but did not pass the FDR<0.1 multiple hypothesis test ( S3B Fig ).

All nominally significant transcripts identified in the univariate analyses (p≤ 0.05) were used to generate AD-relevant gene co-expression networks.

To account for unmeasured confounders, within each population, we empirically determined the number of gene expression principal components (PCs) to adjust for in order to maximize the number of nominally significant eQTL associations identified ( P < 0.05).

There was a similar pattern of effect when cells were immunostained with Ab109115 , although this was only mildly significant in the N/P ratio for Hdh Q7/7 cells (p<0.05; S6 Fig ).

The model effectively represents the relationship between input and output variables, as indicated by the highly significant model fit (p < 0.05).

The group difference, however, was only marginally significant, t (198) = 1.97, p = .050, d = 0.28.

Similarly, in the positive word condition beta values in the right dorsal MPFC were significantly higher in the LLS group than in the HLS group (t 38 = 2.15, p < 0.05), whereas in the negative word condition they were higher on a marginal significance in the HLS group than in the LLS group (t 38 = 2.01, p = 0.05).

When stratified by year, a moderate increase was observed in the expected heterozygosity from H E = 0.5 in 2010 to 0.56 in 2011 and 0.60 in 2012, although this did not reach statistical significance ( P <0.05).

All three cell subsets showed an increasing trend in pAkt in post-dosing in samples from the clinical non-responders, which was significant for CD14 + cells (p<0.05).

Although 12 lakes showed a trend of increasing lake area, this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

This was however of marginal significance (Fisher’s exact: P = 0.05).

Importantly in CONV mice ileal TNF-α showed strong and highly significant correlation with plasma insulin and plasma glucose (R values: insulin = 0.89, P <0.05; glucose = 0.93, P <0.05) at the 16-week time point ( Table 5 ), and this was a particularly strong correlation.

The mean summary performance score did not vary significantly between urban and rural woredas (P-value = 0.87); however, compared with rural woredas, urban woredas had significantly higher rates of skilled birth attendance (50% versus 21%, P-value = 0.01) and higher proportions of households with latrines (81% versus 70%, with borderline significance P-value = 0.05).

When all inflammation markers, significantly associated with breast cancer, were included together in the same model (model I) the risk estimates remained similar (i.e., the effects seemed to be independent of each other), but the association was only borderline significant for IL-1β (p = 0.05).

The prevalence of anti-HEV IgG among pregnant women (11%, CI95 [7–16%]) was lower than that in the entire blood donor group (19% CI95 [13–25%]); the difference with the female blood donor (non pregnant) group was highly significant, with an Odds Ratio ratio of 2.3 (CI95 [1.7–3.24], χ 2 = 4.31, p<0.05).

This difference was marginally significant (χ 2 = 3.77, df = 1, P = 0.05).

The decompensated cirrhosis group scored lower in all domains than the compensated cirrhosis group, but all of the differences did not reach statistical significance except for the SS domain and the overall score (p<0.05).

The average difference of predictability between these two populations was a highly significant 0.10 (0.08 standard deviation, Wilcoxon sign-rank test p<0.05).

There was a borderline significant 1.7-fold increase in mean Errα mRNA levels (95% CI 0.99 to 2.49; p = 0.05).

For our replication of previously reported GWAS SNPs (identified mainly in populations of European ancestry) in our multi-ethnic population, we defined nominally significant as ‘p<0.05 and not corrected for multiple testing.’ Given the different recruitment and BP measurement in the Mt.

Despite the higher hazard ratios, they did not reach statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Some amino acids, such as proline exhibited a negative trend in their concentrations among subjects with a high GRS compared to those with a low GRS ( p < 0.05) (Table 7 in S1 Appendix ).

The strength of this effect weakened across subsequent age periods though the pattern across age periods was not significantly different for women (p-value = 0.2 for interaction) and was of borderline significance for men (p-value = 0.05 for interaction).

Yolk height, thick albumen height, and haugh units were unaffected by the treatment, while thin albumen height showed a trend towards reduction in the PRSE group at weeks 47 and 49 (P = 0.05).