Excerpts

Differences were considered as significant or highly significant at p <0.05 or p <0.01, respectively.

As for cheating on exams, Model 3 showed a marginally significant negative association for extraversion ( b = –0.18, SE = 0.11, t = –1.97, p < .05), indicating that higher extraversion tended to decrease the probability of cheating.

The relationship between number of lymph nodes retrieved and RFS was marginally significant (P = 0.05, Fig. 3 ).

In terms of the latter aspect, these four genes are indeed significant as all of them achieved nominally significant (p < 0.05) or marginally significant (p < 0.10) p values in our discovery and replication datasets.

Finally, the Proteobacteria showed a trend of increasing with age: the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in the 100-day-old group was significantly higher than that in the 80-day-old group (P<0.05).

Antimalarials were administered to 11 patients (58%), 73% of whom died during hospitalisation, yielding a borderline significant positive association between antimalarial administration and fatal outcome (OR 5.93, 95%CI: 0.93–50.5, Fisher's exact p-value = 0.05).

As many as three in four respondents (75%) agreed with the statement ‘My medical information and DNA belong to me, and I have allowed the researcher to use them for this study.’ There was a significant trend with age; younger people were more likely to believe they retained ownership of their DNA and medical information (p<0.05).

Having anal sex with 5+ non-regular male sex partners was marginally non-significant at the p<.05 level (AOR: 1.8, 95%CI: 1.0,3.5; p = .067).

Hyperglycemia was associated with an increase in the following parameters: Vmax (p<0.001), S'max (p<0.001), strain rate, (p = 0.02) and strain (near-significant: p = 0.05).

Furthermore, Group × Task-type × Time interaction was found to be marginally significant [F(1, 29) = 4.08, p = .05, η p 2 = .12], indicating that the group differences were most likely inconsistent across Task-type (i.e., shape classification vs. digit classification).

The results of subgroup analysis are shown in S3 Fig in S1 File : in subgroups such as mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy, hypertension, diabetes, vasopressors, INR, and fresh frozen plasma, the mortality risk of the rapidly ascending RDW group (Traj1) was significantly higher than that of the stable low-level group (Traj0) ( P < 0.05); while in subgroups such as age, chronic kidney disease, and Hb, although the mortality risk of the Traj1 group showed an increasing trend, the difference in some subgroups did not reach statistical significance ( P > 0.05), which may be related to the limited statistical power of smaller subgroups and residual confounding.

There is only a significant trend ( p < 0.05) in fPAR at PC3, which was increasing at a rate of 0.002 units per year over the 11 years of the time series ( Table 2 ).

[ 16 ] were excluded because control group genotypes reached borderline significance for HWE (p = 0.05), and the results of Sale et al.

The P n and PE values of the cotton leaves in the salt dust treatment groups all showed a decreasing trend compared to the control with significant differences between groups A and (B, C), and D, and E, and F ( P <0.05), but no significant differences were observed between groups B and C.

Winter also resulted in a drastic change in the structure of communities making all of the indices highly significant (p < 0.05).

More specifically, the 34 selected variants from MelGene were distinguished in two groups: 1) all variants associated with melanoma at a level of p<0.05 following meta-analysis of relevant data from at least 3 independent case-control datasets (28 variants) and 2) additional biologically plausible variants representing potential causal pathways and selected from GWAS (3 variants) and candidate gene studies (3 variants) with genome-wide (p<10 −7 ) or nominally significant (p<0.05) associations.

Also, in blacks, the association between the sRAGE SNP (rs2071288) and incident CHD (HR 1.24, 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.55) nearly reached significance (P = 0.05), and this analysis was underpowered (power = 52%).

IFNγ and IL-6 levels in culture/GeneXpert positive patients decreased between days 0 and 7 (overall both p<0.0001) and changes were weakly significant in culture/GeneXpert negative patients (p = 0.05 and 0.03, respectively).

The group×target valence×congruency interaction also approached significance [ F (1,38) = 4.72, p <.05], but no interaction between any two factors approached significance (all p s>.05).

All these factors were significantly associated with susceptibility to WTS except for perceived harm of WTS relative to cigarettes, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

There was a trend towards increased FN at 12 hrs (p<0.06), but this did not reach statistical significance. *, p<0.05.

Genetic distance measures were higher among sites within the western group than among sites within the eastern group, and permutation tests approached significance at the P < 0.05 level ( F ST : West: 0.023, East: 0.002, P = 0.0610; G” ST : West: 0.220, East: 0.016, P = 0.057; Jost’s D: West: 0.202, East: 0.014, P = 0.057).

We noticed a trend toward significance for IFNα at both baseline and one month post treatment (unadjusted p-value <0.05).

However, in this case, the difference between Cerro de los Ánsares and Entremuros was only marginally significant (p = 0.05, Tukey test).

A significant trend (p≤ 0.05) between hearing shift and cisplatin dosage, especially at frequencies 9000Hz and above was observed for the right ear and this dose-response is evident in Fig 5 .