Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp = 0.0250.5× alphaqualifiedgold
Both the main effects of Display Orientation (F(1;180) = 57.598, p < 0.001; effect size, eta squared η 2 = 0.567; with greater face response rates for upright orientation) and Gender of Observer (F(1;180) = 9.498, p = 0.004; effect size, η 2 = 0.178; with greater face response rates in females) were highly significant with a significant interaction between these factors (F(1;180) = 5.405, p = 0.025; effect size, η 2 = 0.110).
marginal significancep = 0.0250.5× alphagold
Among non-achievers, those with longer diabetes duration (≥10 years) had more oral antidiabetic medications [4.00 (3.75–4.00) vs 3.00 (2.50–3.50), p = 0.07] with marginal significance, and paradoxically lower 12-week TIR [62.00% (52.50–68.00) vs 87.00% (68.50–93.45%), p = 0.025] ( S3 Table ).
marginal significancep = 2.53 x 10 −020.5× alphagold
We did not find significance for the previously identified African allele, HLA-DRB1*15 : 03 at the pre-specified significance level of 1.0 x 10 −04 ; however, after conditioning on the three independent African classical alleles, marginal significance was seen (OR = 1.23, p = 2.53 x 10 −02 ), indicating that HLA-DRB1*15 : 03 does contribute to MS risk within this sample.
weakly significantP = 0.02580.5× alphaqualifiedgold
Together with the weakly significant P value in the dominant model ( P = 0.0258) and the recessive model ( P = 0.0224), there is a reasonable interpretation for these findings: the additive model or the multiplicative model (the allelic comparisons) may be more accurate to describe the effect of EGR3 in schizophrenia etiology [28] .
marginally significantP = 0.0260.5× alphagold
To confirm that these trends are representative of whole genome patterns, I also analyzed a larger set of 13,659 genes sequenced in both species (2,335 X-linked and 11,424 autosomal; see Materials and Methods for details), which produced the same non-significant results for d N (median d N = 0.0039 for X-linked genes and 0.0038 for autosomal genes; Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.76) and marginally significant results for ω (median ω = 0.092 for X-linked genes and 0.086 for autosomal genes; Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.026).
showed a trendP = 0.0260.5× alpha
The expression of three of the ten most up-regulated genes from the experimental sleep restriction showed a trend for correlation with self-reported insufficient sleep among the DILGOM subjects: TLR4 ( P = 0.026, β = +0.27, P corrected = 0.26), HIPK3 ( P = 0.006, β = +0.90, P corrected = 0.059), and FCRL2 ( P = 0.018, β = +1.02, P corrected = 0.18), but it was not statistically significant after correction with the number of genes analyzed in the population sample (N = 10).