Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

modestly significantP = 0.020.4× alphaqualifiedgold
Previously, the UGT1A7*3 allele exhibited modestly significant association with colorectal cancer (OR = 2.39; P = 0.02) [ 57 ], lung cancer [ 62 ], endometrial cancer [ 63 ] and pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.98; P = 0.003) [ 64 ] with a particularly strong association in smokers with pancreatic carcinoma who were younger than 55 years (OR = 4.7; P = 0.0009), suggesting the magnitude of the observed associations may be modified by environmental interactions.
approached significancep = 0.020.4× alpha
None of these symptoms were significant predictors of long COVID in the adjusted model ( Table 3 ) (sleep disturbance was the only symptom category that approached significance ( p = 0.02)), however ME/CFS, joint pain, and several others demonstrated high variance inflation factors (S1 Table D.4 in S1 File ) indicating possible underestimation of their effects (S1 Appendix D in S1 File ).
highly significantp = 0.020.4× alphaqualifiedgold
The overall pooled effect size of the static balance function in the experimental group did not significantly differ from that in the control group [Hedges’ g: 1.32 (95% CI: -0.41, 3.06) at p = 0.13], with a highly significant difference in heterogeneity ( I 2 = 81% at p = 0.02).
weakly significantp = 0.0220.4× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of the M100 amplitudes revealed a weakly significant main effect of frequency in which higher frequencies have larger amplitudes ( F (5,88) = 2.79; p = 0.022), no main effect for signal type ( F (1,88) = 0.54; p = 0.46), and a significant interaction between frequency and signal type ( F (5,88) = 5.82; p <0.0001).
borderline significantP = 0.0220.4× alphagold
When the same analysis was done for each tumour stage separately, a borderline significant correlation between the 16p13.3 alteration and disease recurrence was only observed in stage II tumours (*P = 0.022) (Figures B-D in S6 File ).
Focus on 16p13.3 Locus in Colon Cancer.
PLoS One · 2015 · PMC4519182
marginally significantp = .0220.4× alphagold
Post-hoc tests using the Bonferroni correction revealed that for the group without experience with the horse-riding dance, only RTs for MP5 showed significant or marginally significant differences from all the other MPs ( p = .022 for MP1, p = .052 for MP4, p = .001 for MP8; MP1, 382.88ms; MP4, 377.71ms; MP5, 396.51ms; MP8, 364.52ms), whereas the other three MPs did not.