Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
There was a highly significant increase in DIT after consuming the whole food meal compared to the more processed meal (whole food meal: 99.4 (40.7) kJ/h; processed meal: 63.9 (35.6) kJ/h, p < 0.001 for total kJ and p < 0.01 for total % ECM [ 26 ]). 3.7.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The effect of history of recent hypercholesterolemia treatment was highly significant in the GLMs of both outcomes ( p < 0.001), and the achieved statistical power was β = 64.5 and β = 74.2 for LDL-C and TC, respectively.
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In all groups of mothers there was a highly significant correlation between fish consumption and total HHg concentrations: riverine (Spearman r = 0.8089, p = 0.001), urban (Spearman r = 0.7681, p = 0.001), rural (Spearman r = 0.7644, p = 0.001), and tin miner (Spearman r = 0.1211, p = 0.001); thus, confirming total HHg as a reliable biomarker of fish consumption [ 16 ].
an overall trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Radwan et al., 2021 reported an overall trend towards healthier eating during lockdown according to an increase in the self-reported quality and healthiness of food ( p < 0.001), a higher median ‘food quality score’ ( p < 0.001), and increased ratings of eating healthy food as very good/excellent ( p < 0.001), alongside increases in three markers of healthy eating ( p < 0.001), and decreases in three markers of unhealthy eating ( p < 0.001) in the presence of a decrease in one marker of healthy eating ( p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
For the QGBI values, the LMM model shows highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) for both the measurement and the measurement × group interaction in the absence of any significant effect due to sex and age ( Table 3 ).
marginally significantp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
After controlling for potential confounders, significant or marginally significant and positive associations were observed between dietary intakes of total protein (standardized coefficient, β = 0.104 and 0.118, p < 0.001), animal protein ( β = 0.073 and 0.067, p < 0.05), and protein from white meat ( β = 0.074 and 0.067, p < 0.01) with changes in BMD at the femur neck and trochanter, respectively.
a decreasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
There was a statistically significant increasing trend of total energy ( p for trend < 0.001), and percent of energy from carbohydrates ( p for trend < 0.001), and total sugar intake ( p for trend < 0.001) moving from non-consumers up through the highest level of intake, while there was a decreasing trend in percent energy from total fat and protein ( p < 0.001, Table 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In reference to frozen fish consumption, small families and large families present similar behavior in the comparison between the two cohorts: monthly consumption shows a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.001 for small and large families), while we note a significant increase for weekly consumption ( p = 0.001 for small families and p < 0.001 for large families) and for biweekly consumption ( p = 0.027 for small families and p = 0.002 for large families).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Zooming in on critical interferon response genes, the heatmaps and GEE analyses of their combined z-score ( Figure 4 a,b) showed that, despite heterogeneity in timing between individuals, there was a highly significant interferon-induced response already on d3 in the low-dose group ( p < 0.001), and on d9 and d6 for the no- and high-dose group, respectively.
extremely significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualified
All extracts showed extremely significant inhibitory effects vs . control ( Figure 3 B, *** p < 0.001) depending on the concentration and the plant, except Abelmoschus and Hibiscus at 10 μg/mL, which increased the formation of free radicals, compared to the control.