Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

near-significantp = 0.0721.4× alphagold
Regarding changes in MDA concentrations over time, there was a non-significant 12.49% decrease in the nutraceutical group ( p = 0.294) and a near-significant 26.52% increase in the placebo group ( p = 0.072).
borderline significancep = 0.0721.4× alpha
The mean estimated 24 h urinary Na excretion (mmol/24 h) was lower in the intervention period with borderline significance (157.3 ± 35.3 vs. 160.8 ± 32.5, p = 0.072), and the K excretion (mmol/24 h) was significantly higher in the intervention period (40.0 ± 9.7 vs. 38.0 ± 8.5, p = 0.001).
marginally significantP = 0.0721.4× alphagold
There was a marginally significant interaction between city and “brand vs. bulk” in predicting the proportion of oil samples that were fortified ( P = 0.072): over 70% of “brand name” oil samples were fortified in both cities, whereas, among “bulk” oil samples, 41% in Yaoundé, but only 10% in Douala, were fortified.
Also, the geometric OSI mean values were different in the tested groups with a tendency toward statistical significance ( p = 0.073), being the highest in the morbidly obese patients (GM = 29.24, 95% CI for GM: 23.73–36.04) and the lowest in the overweight group (GM = 19.03, 95% CI for GM: 14.83–24.42). 3.2.
marginal significancep = 0.0731.5× alphagold
In contrast, at 6 months post-treatment there were significant, positive correlations between vitamin B6 levels and NAA (ρ = 0.523, p = 0.007), creatine (ρ = 0.413, p = 0.040), and choline (ρ = 0.489, p = 0.013) concentrations; and vitamin B12 and creatine concentrations (ρ = 0.406, p = 0.041), whereas there was marginal significance for choline concentration (ρ = 0.359, p = 0.073).
nominally significantp = 0.0741.5× alphagold
In these analyses, the B1–cfPWV estimate remained inverse after additional adjustment for vaccine doses and SARS-CoV-2 ELISA variables (β = −0.508; 95% CI: −0.975 to −0.042; p = 0.033; FDR q = 0.109), whereas the B6–cfPWV estimate was attenuated and was no longer nominally significant (β = −0.275; 95% CI: −0.577 to 0.027; p = 0.074; FDR q = 0.147).
showed a trendp = 0.0751.5× alpha
A significant effect of treatment for feeling ready to perform was identified [ F (2, 84.12) = 3.211, p = 0.045], with post-hoc comparisons identifying no significant difference between the active and placebo groups but the DHA-rich group (59.12) showed a trend towards being significantly less ready to perform than the EPA-rich group (66.65; p = 0.075) ( Figure 3 ).