Targeting of TFEC also attenuated LIPA expression, even though the merger of biological replicates revealed a statistical trend after correction for multiple hypothesis testing (Fig. 5e ; p = 0.14).
Excerpts
marginally non-significantp = 0.14
Its correlation with surface soil moisture is marginally non-significant ( r = −0.34, p = 0.14).
showed a trendp = 0.1466
1e ), and aging upregulated genes showed a trend towards downregulation by MI ( p = 0.1466, Fig. 1f ).
Only a nonsignificant trend for reduced volume was detected for hippocampus (9.06% for Fus + /+ vs. 8.62% for Fus ΔNLS/+ ; p = 0.15; Two-sided Unpaired Student’s t -test) and striatum (9.76% for Fus + /+ vs. 9.89% for Fus ΔNLS/+ ; p = 0.56, Two-sided Unpaired Student’s t -test).
Young’s modulus showed a strong trend of reduction in treated scars, with 5/6 treated scars recording a lower YM than their matched vehicle treated scar (Fig. 8g , p = 0.15), suggesting PXS-6302 treated scars are more pliable than their placebo-treated controls.
showed a trendp < 0.156
Furthermore, indirect interactions removal by stDPI/DPI showed a trend towards higher accuracy (intersection: p < 0.156) but higher network coverage (full: p < 1.9e-6), compared to using a contextualized reference network from LinkPhinder (LP) 16 , and improved on both counts (intersection: p < 0.003, full: p < 4.4e-4) when using HSM 15 as a reference network.
Consistent with the original report, there was a weak trend to improved RFS with melanoma cognate help (HR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.50–1.12, P = 0.16, Addendum Figure 1D; original report: HR 0.77, 95% CI: 0.51–1.18, P > 0.22).
showed a trendp = 0.16
1d ) and PKCε also showed a trend towards higher values (1.5 ± 1.5 vs 2.1 ± 1.9 AU, p = 0.16, CPM) at 2 weeks.
showed a trendP = 0.16
1 , and found that sEPSCs showed a trend towards higher frequency in the inhibitory neurons than in the excitatory neurons (Fig. 3c ; 1.32 ± 0.30 Hz (2 mM, Ext) vs. 3.08 ± 1.16 Hz (2 mM, Int); P = 0.16, unpaired t test).
showed a trendp = 0.16
Even in the absence of visual input, posterior RSC showed a trend toward larger decoding errors as compared with the anterior subregion (13.4 ± 0.7 cm vs. 20.1 ± 3.8 cm; p = 0.16, anterior vs. posterior, n = 6 vs. 3 sessions; Supplementary Fig. 3B ).
We also found the shorter sleepers had relatively fewer night wakes in both the ABCD and SSBC datasets ( p = 0.051 for the ABCD study and p = 0.161 for the Shanghai dataset; marginally significant), indicating higher sleep efficiency in these adolescents.
Despite the negative trend in μ S , a high level of resilience R C for warm conditions was maintained across the LUI gradient (linear mixed model (lme), F 1,35 =3.8, P =0.060; with a marginally significant increase that was consistent across regions, F 1,35 =0.5, P =0.181).
In contrast to Se for which there is a negative trend between the concentrations of organic Se fractions and the Se concentrations in plant leaves and roots ( p = 0.19; Fig. 7c ), the concentrations of organic S in larger and aliphatic OM and smaller and/or less hydrophobic, aromatic OM positively correlate with plant S concentrations (Fig. 7b, d ).
Similarly, the water-soluble sulfate concentrations positively correlate with the S concentrations in plant roots ( p < 0.05), and there is a positive trend between the water-soluble sulfate concentrations and the S concentrations in plant leaves (p = 0.19; Fig. 7b ).
BRCA samples treated with paclitaxel showed marginal significance ( P = 0.20, Fig. 4C ), although the group annotated with complete or partial response had significantly higher response than the group with stable or clinical progressive disease ( P = 0.03, Fig. 4D ).
Kidney function in four additional pairs of monkeys To assess the significance of the above findings in a larger cohort and the longer-term effects of preemptive mAb107 treatment on the right kidney function following I/R, the above studies were repeated in eight additional monkeys, randomized to four in each group, a number expected to yield highly significant ( P ≤0.2) differences based on the initial pair.
showed a trendp < 0.2
Moreover, the rates of N 2 fixation showed a trend towards higher activity with a decreasing nitrate flux, albeit this trend was relatively noisy ( R 2 = 0.50, p < 0.2; Supplementary Fig. 9g ).
Notably, for each of the seven tasks where these nominally significant TDS elevations were seen, the behavior-task combinations involved were not enriched for behavioral scales showing a statistically significant SDB ( P > 0.2 in Fisher’s Exact tests for associations between whether a scale shows statistically significant SDB, Fig. 3a , and TDS, Fig. 4b , across seven tasks)—indicating that observing a difference in the mean score of a behavioral trait between sexes is not predictive of that trait showing a divergent BWAS map between sexes.
showed a trendp = 0.21
The patients with positive baseline ctDNA showed a trend of worse EFS (Fig. 3A , p = 0.21, HR = 3.39, 95% CI: 0.44–26.3) and DRFS (Fig. 3B , p = 0.08, HR not calculable) than the ones with negative baseline ctDNA, but the differences were not statistically significant.
a trend towards significancep = 0.22
The relationship between the early peaking pupil component and temporal distance memory was significant in Experiment 3 ( ρ = 0.43; p = 0.016) and showed a trend towards significance in Experiment 2 ( ρ = 0.21; p = 0.22) when these experiments were analyzed separately.
showed a trendp = 0.23
Conversely, increased CDK6 significantly associated with decreased OS in mUC (HR: 1.87, p < 0.01) and showed a trend toward lower OS in NSCLC (HR = 1.40, p = 0.23), and lower PFS in RCC (HR = 1.2, p = 0.5).
showed a trendP = 0.23
Notably, CAPN14 mRNA expression in esophageal biopsies showed a trend of being lower in patients with familial EoE than non-familial EoE ( P = 0.23) (Supplementary Fig. 11a ).
This analysis revealed a nonsignificant trend towards higher firing rate during the 2 s preceding a spindle event (one-way RM ANOVA, χ 2 = 2.88, P = 0.24).
In the hTERT WT data, we found that SPE scores had a positive trend with expansion ( r = 0.51, p = 2.5 e − 1, Fig.
showed a trendp = 0.26
However, ESV between Wk8 and M6 was not different in DFP+/IMH+ group ( p = 0.49), while ESV showed a trend towards increasing between Wk8 and M6 in DFP−/IMH+ group ( p = 0.26).