Barely Significant

Excerpts

5,163 sentences · 1 filter applied

slightly significantp value = 0.0350.7× alphaqualifiedgold
By stratifying patients according to the ICR/GIE classification of week 12 biopsies we found a slightly significant difference ( p value = 0.035, log-rank test) in OS and in PFS ( p value = 0.022, log-rank test) between the High-ICR/GIE and the High-ICR/Non-GIE group (Fig. 6c and Supplementary Fig 9b ).
an increasing trendp = 0.0360.7× alphagold
Whilst no temporal or seasonal trends in monthly isolation rates were detected, either for individual infection types or in aggregate ( p > 0.1 using Bartel’s rank test), the 3GCR frequency showed an increasing trend ( p = 0.036 using Bartel’s rank test for trend, see Fig. 1a ), rising from mean 15% (range 10–21% per month) in the first nine months of the study to mean 34% (27–46% per month) in the final three months ( p = 0.0002, using test of difference in proportions of 3GCR between the two periods).
a decreasing trendp = 0.0390.8× alphagold
When we additionally added 5 ng/ml TGF-β to induce Treg cell differentiation, the percentage of Foxp3 + Treg cells in CD4 + T cells showed a decreasing trend with increasing concentrations of LA (Fig. 5b, g , 25 μM, p = 0.039; 50 μM, p = 0.001) but did not cause differentiation of Th17 cells (Fig. 5b, f , p > 0.05).
a negative trendp = 0.040.8× alphagold
This decrease in the daily mean ΔLST w is dominated by a negative trend of the daytime ΔLST w (−0.142 K/decade, p = 0.04), while the nighttime ΔLST w demonstrates only interannual variability with a negligible temporal trend (0.002 K/decade, p = 0.97) (Fig. 1a ).
a decreasing trendp = 0.0450.9× alphagold
The regression coefficients of grass cover showed a decreasing trend along spatial scales, with a significant positive correlation with the relative abundance of RA fungi within the 250 m radius ( β = 0.183; p = 0.045), but negative correlations with the richness ( β = −0.127; p = 0.028), Shannon diversity ( β = −0.172; p = 0.005) and relative abundance ( β = −0.129; p = 0.048) of LFSA fungi within the 10,000 m radius for all plots (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Figs. 7 – 12 ).