The means of each group of variables were compared using one-factor ANOVA, with p -values less than 0.01 ( p < 0.01) being considered highly significant and those less than 0.05 ( p < 0.05) being considered significant.
Excerpts
After the adjustment, a clear trend was observed ( p < 0.05) in which higher back extensor strength was associated with increased AMM (r = 1.12) and BMM (r = 0.89).
borderline significancep = 0.05
This difference showed borderline significance (χ 2 (1, n =79) = 3.97, p = 0.05).
The difference between CeD patients and controls was highly significant ( p < 0.05).
a trend toward significancep = 0.095
IPI showed a trend toward significance at the overall level ( p = 0.095), whereas the high-intermediate/high-risk IPI category reached borderline significance in pairwise comparison (HR = 4.720, p = 0.050).
Survival Pre-HSCT weight, BMI, fat mass, RAPA-Aerobic activity score, Positive Affect, GCGQ score, and ASAS-Wellness all correlated with longer survival; however, these were nominally significant ( p < 0.05) and did not reach significance at our pre-determined level ( p < 0.01).
close to significancep = 0.050
While dichotomizing discharge diagnoses between psychopathological or no mental disorders/harmful substance use, a difference close to significance was found between 2019 and 2020 with 5% of subjects with no mental disorders in 2019 and 12.8% in 2020 (Chi = 3.737, p = 0.050).
The GAM analysis for sleep yielded the most robust explanatory power, explaining 48.7% of the deviance with a highly significant nonlinear relationship (edf: 1.993, F: 122.9, p < 0.05). 3.5.
borderline significancep = 0.05
Subgroup Analysis When stratified into subgroups, time to intubation was shorter for thermal-softened ETTs than for room-temperature tubes in the SLTs with borderline significance (MD: −15.82, 95% CI −31.52 to −0.12, p = 0.05), and were significantly longer in DLTs (MD:1.78, 95% CI: 0.27 to 3.30, p = 0.02) ( Figure 8 ).
However, when compared with patients without psoriatic arthritis, the difference in platelet reactivity was not significant, although a clear trend was visible (82% vs. 74%; p > 0.05).
4.0 m/s, p = 0.019), and in valvuloarterial impedance ( p = 0.032); the SWL decreased by an amount that was nearly significant ( p = 0.050), whereas there was no effect on aortic regurgitation ( Figure 1 , individual data in Supplemental Tables S3 and S4 ).
nearly reached significancep = 0.05
24,534 mm 2 , p = 0.015) and nearly reached significance at the age of 10 years (9572 vs. 12,294 mm 2 , p = 0.05).
Readmission rates showed a borderline significant difference across continence groups ( p = 0.05), whereas complication severity according to Clavien–Dindo classification did not differ significantly.
After adjustment for gestational age and birth weight, the risk of ventilatory support was borderline significant for Group 2 (adjusted OR 3.06; 95% CI 1.00–9.37; p = 0.05) versus Group 1 (reference).
showed a trendp = 0.05
Verbal fluency with phonetic facilitation was positively correlated with NEPSY-II Naming scaled score (r = 0.25; p = 0.02) and showed a trend with the response set (r = 0.25; p = 0.05).
borderline significancep = 0.05
Significance was determined at p < 0.05 and borderline significance at p = 0.05–0.1.
borderline significancep = 0.05
A marked difference emerged in blocks 3 and 4, with OP2 requiring longer procedures (borderline significance at block 3, p = 0.05; block 4, p = 0.08).
One study reported that IPSS-R outperformed IPSS in predicting OS [ 44 ], with a C-index of 0.74 ( p < 0.001), and showed borderline significant superiority over WPSS ( p = 0.05), although no significant differences were found for PFS prediction.
A borderline significant difference for elevated arterial hypertension rates was seen in BAC-positive patients (35% vs. 27%, p = 0.05).
quite close to significancep > 0.05
No statistically significant relationship was found between age and diagnosis, although the relationship was quite close to significance ( p > 0.05).
38), pre-SLS test-dominant (26.8% decrease in falls for 1 unit increase in pre-SLS test-dominant, p = 0.003), pre-SLS test-non-dominant (15.9% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in pre-SLS test-non-dominant, p = 0.029), MMSE (10.9% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in MMSE, p = 0.018), and marginally significant for pre-FRT (4.6% decrease in falls with 1 unit increase in pre-FRT, p = 0.050).
borderline significancep = 0.05
The correlation analysis of persistent pathology with genetic variants shows a borderline significance ( p = 0.05, Table 9 ) when all variants are evaluated as one pool.
The presence of headaches was borderline significant with an OR of 0.04 (95% CI: 0.0006, 0.60; p = 0.05). 4.
In contrast, children with high compliance demonstrated greater autonomy and independence from their families than those with low (marginally significant) and delayed low compliance ( p < 0.05).
showed a trendp = 0.05
Crawford extent V aneurysms showed a trend toward increased frequency in the Late Era (7.46% vs. 3.72%, p = 0.05).