Excerpts

Waiting time had a marginally significant ( p < 0.10) negative coefficient for quality. 4.

Adjusting for annoyance and air pollutants PM 10 and NO 2 revealed a borderline significant association ( p < 0.1) of L NIGHT ≥ 50 dB(A) with a better score on one of the trail making tests ( Supplementary Materials, Table S2 ). 3.2.

For items showing a trend toward significance ( p < 0.10) in the Friedman test, post hoc comparisons were conducted using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Holm correction. 3.

Direct victimization was related to substance use ( p ≤ 0.05) with no controls included (Model 3), but decreased to marginal significance ( p ≤ 0.10) once controls were added in Model 4.

In contrast, the model with TNF-RII showed a trend toward statistical significance ( p ≤ 0.10) for MA21 with increasing TAA-PNC associated with a slight increase in TNF-RII. 3.5.

If p < 0.05, the effect estimates were considered statistically significant, and borderline significant if p < 0.10 [ 46 ]. 2.2.5.

In Table 4 , the only surface that was statistically different between dirty community latrine and household latrine surfaces was the toilet seat/latrine slab ( p < 0.01), while some moderately significant differences ( p = 0.10) were observed when comparing the EC concentrations on the door handles (DH), and both TC and EC concentrations on the sink handles used for handwashing (SH).

Even if students live in the neighborhoods captured at larger distances, one study found the association between neighborhood green space and academic performance is only marginally statistically significant ( p < 0.10) when school green space is accounted for [ 28 ].

The level of statistical marginal significance was set at 0.05 < p < 0.10, as described in [ 53 ]. 3.

Mean Frontal Alpha Power (AF3, F3/AF4, F4) The three-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed that for the alpha frontal oscillation, there was a marginally significant interaction between the factors Green cover, Floor, and Hemisphere F (4,112) = 1.98, p = 0.10, η2 = 0.002.

prerestoration, but in this case both SRP and TP were marginally significant ( p < 0.10).

Generally, there was no interaction for blood lead levels and sex; however, for cord blood lead levels and sex, it was quite close to significance ( p = 0.1).

Trends of marginal significance were indicated by p -values < 0.10.

Effect estimates were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05, and borderline significant if p < 0.10 [ 33 ].

In both multivariate and two-level logistic regression models ( Figure 5 and Table S7 ), the cumulative number of indicators for residential traffic and bedroom ventilation habit had nearly significant interaction effects on childhood pneumonia ( p -value < 0.1).

However, personal opioid use was close to significance, with lower odds of being in the “High Stigma/High Punitive Policy” class ( p = 0.10), which would be expected.

aBMD in the lumbar spine and trabecular vBMD in the L 3 vertebra was lower in the “high HOMA-IR” group, but the differences were only marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

It was found that the direct effect of housing condition on local participants’ mental health was not significant, at 95% confidence level ( p = 0.055), and borderline significance ( p < 0.10) indicated the mild protective effects of better housing conditions upon mental health.

This study observed that, at a marginally significant level ( p < 0.1), older adults exhibited better glycemic control, potentially due to a lower degree of insulin resistance and higher participation/engagement in programs [ 2 ].

Of these, health status, use of an aid for walking and taking medication for mental health were not equally distributed (borderline significance = p < 0.10) between the two groups; all three variables were of higher proportion in the intervention group.

The finding was marginally significant ( p < 0.10) for the Work and Welfare group.

In addition, we found marginally significant differences ( p < 0.1) for “friendly–unfriendly,” “non-enjoyable–enjoyable,” and “restless–calm.” The results show that the respondents found the thinned forest environment more friendly, favorable, and calm. 3.2.2.

The association in men was borderline significant (adjPR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.94, 1.95, p = 0.103).

Next, most visual pattern independent variables were not statistically significant, except the PLAND of blue-class for the EEG.Ex model, which was only marginally significant (at p = 0.108).

Only the anti-hypertension drugs were relatively close to the limit of significance that we established ( p = 0.110) due to the fact that those who take them are less prone to developing it (29.8% vs 39.7%); so, these data could be pointing to the possibility of considering this variable as a protective factor for delirium. 4.