Excerpts

A marginally significant difference from zero for the slopes at 1 SD below the mean (29 years; B = 0.30, SE = 0.16, p = 0.057) indicated the trend that younger age and a higher social media use time were associated with higher levels of perceived loneliness.

Additionally, there was a nearly significant positive relation between EBF and full-term deliveries ( p = 0.057) and LBW ( p = 0.072).

Subjective norms: The video increased the injunctive norm approaching significance ( D = 0.16, t (37) = 1.97, p = 0.057).

Early CRC does not have self-identified symptoms” showed a borderline significance increase in correct response ( p = 0.057) in low eHL group in this Internet-based study, this statement could show a statistically significant increase in correct responses in the future study with a large general population-based study.

Does Green Space Type Matter? A Kruskal–Wallis test to compare mean ranks of EM value for SES by green space type showed marginally significant results (χ 2 (3) = 7.492, p = 0.057).

All model coefficients are statistically significant at a 5% significance level, except the percentage of Native Americans at the margin of statistical significance ( p = 0.057).

For depression, the interaction of time point and nature connection was approaching significance ( p = 0.057) such that there was a stronger association of higher nature connection with lower depression pre-COVID compared to during the coronavirus pandemic. 3.3.2.

Although this was not corroborated by the cognitive failures questionnaire, the difference appears marginally significant (F(1. 60) = 3.75; p = 0.057).

Notably, this decrease almost reached statistical significance ( p = 0.057), so that this result appears promising.

Interestingly, when the discrete quantitative number of children in the family was used, a significant direct effect of it was observed on PDA (0.1947, p = 0.030), and the indirect effect of parental education through the number of children was borderline significant for PDA (0.0481, p = 0.057) and for CA (0.0663, p = 0.050) ( Supplementary Table S4 ).

A borderline significant difference of %TBR < 54 mg/dL levels ( p = 0.057) between the three subgroups was also found.

Perceptions of organizational support significantly increased from baseline to 12 months (Mean difference = 0.396; p = 0.0278), and there was a borderline significant decrease in burnout (Mean difference = −0.287; p = 0.057). 4.

Small attitude changes from pre- to post-testing were also examined: a nonsignificant trend towards an increase in mean ST pros ( t (472) = 1.905, p < 0.057) and a significant decrease in mean ST cons ( t (462) = 2.504, p < 0.013) was found.

However, adjusted OR estimates for both methods are nearly all >1 and we observed, for the online questionnaire, associations close to the borderline significant threshold (in bold) for scented HDCPs ( p = 0.0572), irritants ( p = 0.0679) and sprays ( p = 0.0924).

The Friedman test revealed marginally significant differences among conditions for “Anger–Hostility” ( p = 0.058) and “Confusion–Bewilderment” ( p = 0.079).

For educational level, the difference is borderline significant ( p = 0.058) in favor of the higher educated from the secondary grammar or art school.

Moreover, in the aspect of positive psychological emotions, the lower-grade students are obviously higher than the upper-grade students, and the second- and third-grade students present marginal significance, p = 0.058.

A similar trend was noted during SCWT, however this effect was marginally significant (F (1,12) = 4.39; p = 0.058). nHbT values were found to remain stable across both time points ( i.e. , Fall and Spring) across all the tests in the neurocognitive test battery (all p > 0.114; Figure 3 ).

Serum sodium concentration increased significantly from the beginning to the end of exercise in both MOD and HI sessions (time effect: p = 0.003) and decreased during recovery (time effect: p < 0.0001), with a nonsignificant trend towards higher serum sodium in MOD versus HI during both exercise (treatment effect: p = 0.058, interaction: p = 0.62) and recovery (treatment effect: p = 0.08, interaction: p = 0.56) ( Figure 1 C).

Of the group of participants who were already ill, a disproportionate share showed a trend of not being vaccinated without reaching a significant difference ( p = 0.058).

The simple effects analysis indicated that the amplitude of P200 at Fz was greater (marginally significant) than the delayed selection ( p = 0.058) in the group with negative body image at fatness subscale, but not in the control group.

The positive joint effect of soda intake and smoking on COPD was marginally significant ( p = 0.058).

For patients with mercury > 1 μg/L, we observed a borderline significant difference between CAL and non-CAL groups ( p = 0.058).

In terms of the malnutrition-risk group, the total MNA score was significantly correlated with the scores on the UPDRS Section 1 ( r = −0.47, p = 0.020) and 2 ( r = −0.47, p = 0.019) and approached significance for the total score ( r = −0.39, p = 0.058) of the UPDRS scale.

Differences between profiles 2 and 4 were marginally significant ( p = 0.058).