approached significancep = 0.055
The main effect of condition approached significance in the route distance task, F (3,74) = 2.65, p = 0.055, partial η 2 = 0.10.
The main effect of condition approached significance in the route distance task, F (3,74) = 2.65, p = 0.055, partial η 2 = 0.10.
Additionally, there were significant two-way interactions between valence and context ( F (2,456) = 103.24, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.312), approximately significant two-way interactions between word class and context ( F (1,228) = 3.73, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.016), and significant two-way interactions between valence and word class ( F (2,246) = 45.65, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.167).
With regard to eating behavior, the results showed that those who responded reported almost significant ( U = 96.5, p = 0.055) higher levels of goal achievement than those who did not respond.
This association persisted as a marginally significant trend for long-term effects ( r s = 0.745, p = 0.055, q = 0.059).
Task accuracy narrowly missed statistical significance across sessions ( p = 0.055), likely due to heterogeneity in individual response patterns and the limited sample size, which reduced statistical power to detect modest, clinically meaningful effects.
The model was approached significance: F (4, 300) = 2.35, p = 0.055, R 2 ≈ 0.03.
A marginally significant interaction between prosodic boundary and the semantic bias type of ambiguous phrase was found in this region on TFD ( b = 314.29, SE = 163.54, t = 1.92, p = 0.055).
Additionally, while partialing out the effect of child age, there were negative correlations between the total CELF score of the child and the total number of adult utterances ( r [19] = −0.48, p = 0.031), total number of adult questions ( r [19] = −0.61, p = 0.004), number of adult closed questions ( r [19] = −0.57, p = 0.008), and marginal significance for number of adult open questions ( r [19] = −0.44, p = 0.055).
When only data from the schizophrenic group were used, the Chlorpromazine Index showed marginally significant correlations with both performance indexes in the Standard Time Bisection task (bias: r = −0.57, p = 0.055; precision: r = −0.54, p = 0.067).
The main effect of gender on Eagerness to Adopt AV was marginally significant, F (1,402) = 3.70, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.01, suggesting higher Eagerness to Adopt AV in male respondents.
For variables that were not comparable across countries or unique to one country, there was an effect for higher maternal education being associated with more stroking of marginal significance in India ( p = 0.055) but significantly less stroking in the United Kingdom ( p = 0.007).
Also, two marginally significant interactions of anxiety × skill level [ F (1,34) = 3.93, p = 0.055, η p 2 = 0.10] and anxiety × occlusion time [ F (1,34) = 3.83, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.10] were observed.
Findings were consistent when limiting the analysis to children of European descent, although the additive model for rs1800497 was not statistically significant ( p = 0.097) and the dominant model for rs1800497 was borderline significant ( p = 0.055) in this subset (Supplementary Table 1).
Model results showed no significant total and direct effects (β = 0.08, p > 0.10; β = 0.08, p > 0.10, respectively), however, the indirect effect from intervention to ESI kindergarten via spring EF and spring task behavior in preschool was marginally significant (β = 0.004, p = 0.055) (see Figure 4 ).
The effect of playback speed on participants’ overall perceptions of the speaker was marginally significant ( p = 0.055), with speakers being rated higher at 1x speed ( M = 4.44, SD = 0.58) than at 1.25x ( M = 4.24, SD = 0.79) and 1.5x speeds ( M = 4.20, SD = 0.88).
This was true for the larger individual dataset also, t (93) = 2.38, p = 0.019, η 2 = 0.057, while the trend in the other dataset fell short of significance, t (39) = 1.98, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.091, though the effect size was larger.
Apartment-Task Performance As illustrated in Figure 2 , there was a marginally significant difference between the three experimental conditions regarding the apartment-task performance, F (2, 142) = 2.96, p = 0.055, η 2 p = 0.04.
We conducted a two way (time × 3, putt distance × 4) ANOVA on this data which showed the main effect of time to be approaching significance [ F (2,10) = 3.94, p = 0.055, r = 0.53] but the interaction effect was non-significant [ F (6,30) = 1.14, p = 0.36, r = 0.19].
We found a marginally significant task type × electrode × group interaction effect, F (3, 117) = 2.62, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.06.
The control group also reached significance in the English-to-Chinese direction ( d = 0.64), but only marginally significant in the Chinese-to-English direction ( p = 0.055).
Simple main effect analyses demonstrated that somatic anxiety increased from the pre- to the pressure test and was significant for the contraction group ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant for the no-contraction group ( p = 0.055).
Flow did not mediate the relationship between grit and any of the outcomes ( p > 0.05) and is marginally significant for the relationship between flow metacognition and burnout [ b = −0.12, SE = 0.06, p = 0.055, 95% CI (−0.22, −0.02), β = −0.09].
For NH listeners in the vocoded condition, there were significant main effects for fricative spectrum ( p < 0.001) and formant transitions ( p < 0.05), and a marginally significant effect of vowel ( p = 0.055), all in the expected directions.
A follow-up t -test indicated that non-clustered learners showed a marginal trend toward better memory than clustered learners for the first 30 LP trials ( t (60) = 1.96, p = 0.055, Cohen’s d = 0.51, CL effect size = 64%; clustered: M = 0.57, 95% CI [0.51, 0.62]; non-clustered: M = 0.65, 95% CI [0.58, 0.72]).
However, the effect was borderline significant even after applying the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure ( p = 0.055), which suggests that scene stability may influence occurrence of cyber sickness and that the issue is worthy of further investigation.