Barely Significant

Excerpts

6,422 sentences · 1 filter applied

Y i = α + β 1 ⁢ X i + β 2 ⁢ D i ⁢ N ⁢ A ⁢ V ⁢ G ⁢ s + β 3 ⁢ D i ⁢ A ⁢ V ⁢ G ⁢ s + β 4 ⁢ ( X i ⁢ D i ⁢ N ⁢ A ⁢ V ⁢ G ⁢ s ) (5) + β 5 ⁢ ( X i ⁢ D i ⁢ A ⁢ V ⁢ G ⁢ s ) + ε i Results There was a marginally significant positive correlation between average medium alpha ratios and C parameter values, R 2 = 0.11, r = 0.33, t (36) = 2.06, p uncorrected = 0.023, p corrected = 0.093, BF 10 = 3.96.
Despite this, we were able to confirm predictions that the first violin player should have higher heart rate than the others and that the two players with a supportive role during second movement had low HR and high HF during the second concert when the group felt “safer.” Despite our small sample size, the total between movement variation in heart rate and high frequency power approached significance.
We found that (a) EF interventions may not have an effect on weight loss, (b) baseline inhibition (β = 0.259, p = 0.03) and delay discounting (β = −0.17, p = 0.04) significantly predict future weight loss through obesity intervention, (c) age ( F = 13.666, p = 0.005) moderates the relationship between working memory and weight loss through intervention, but not weight status, type of intervention, and percentage of female, and (d) early life inhibition (β = 0.185, p = 0.07) is a marginally significant predictor of future weight loss.