Excerpts

The P600 effect was marginally significant in Training 2 for this condition.

In IAT 3, there was a marginally significant effect in the expected direction, suggesting that participant's associate triangle with yellow and square with red, as Kandinsky would have predicted.

In the ROI below the meridian the difference between low-contrast offset and onset is marginally significant (uncorrected, see Table 2 ).

Furthermore, the results showed an expected trend of increase in intertemporal decision making at retest suggesting that intertemporal decision making benefited from repeated task exposure.

A main effect of Belief condition revealed a non-significant trend, F (1, 23) = 2.958, p = 0.099, indicating that anti-free will participants tended to be slower to respond than controls (though this interpretation should be approached with caution due to the marginal significance level).

Results indicated a trend toward significant recruitment above baseline for actively learned letters in the left fusiform gyrus [ t (11) = 2.02, p = 068] (Figure 7A ) and right fusiform gyrus [ t (11) = 1.98, p = 0.073], (Figure 7B ) but no other contrasts approached significance.

The only other effect of relevance was a marginally significant two-way interaction between 1-back and OSPAN group, showing a more pronounced RT sequential effect for the low OSPAN group (indicated by the difference between the red and purple lines in Figure 1 top for this group), F (1, 50) = 2.88, p < 0.10 (note that this would be significant in a directional test, which would be appropriate here).

We believe that what led our L2 → L1 effects to be highly significant was a combination of the large statistical power we had (36 participants/group and 58 items/condition) and of the lexical characteristics of the test items.

The categorical associations of each of these methods of determining hemisity with each other and with asymmetry of the vgACC were highly significant (Morton and Rafto, 2010 ).

Perhaps the most intriguing difference between single episode and cluster activation is present when Speaker F2 utters all speech material: in the single episode activation, familiar sentences yielded no statistically significant higher familiarity scores than novel sentences, while the difference is highly significant with cluster activation. 5.3.

However, when comparing IGT performance between gambling disorder sufferers and healthy controls dependent on dopamine release, a highly significant pattern emerged.

Discussion Participants with false intent showed a significantly lower blink count difference and lower number of blinks for the Explosive Intent questions as compared to the Drug Intent questions, with the difference in maximum blink duration approaching significance, as compared to participants with truthful intent.

Following common parlance in the literature, we refer to statistical findings with p -values of between 0.05 and 0.10 as “marginally significant.” To obtain the delta plots, the RTs for each participant and distractor type were rank ordered and divided in five RT quintiles (bins) of equal or near-equal size.

Reducing the variance within the groups of patients and controls resulted in highly significant differences between patients and controls.

We found significant effects in cognitive abilities related to attention and executive function (significant improvement in Stroop and a positive trend in TMT-A).

Discussion While the ratings of the alternatives showed only marginally significant group differences in favor of the distractor group, the fraction of choices in favor of the best-alternative was highly significant, consistent with the UTT hypothesis (Dijksterhuis, 2004 ; Dijksterhuis et al., 2006 ).

The most important result in this study is that both the raw scores (controlling for age) and the scaled scores showed highly significant correlations across the different measures (the WISC-IV, RCPM, TONI-4, and WNV), in particular between the WISC-IV FSIQ and the three non-verbal tests.

Interestingly, however, when comparing only the high alpha trials in which the phosphene was seen versus those in which it was not seen, a strong trend in frontal areas is revealed.

The main effect of Step was highly significant and accounted for the highest proportion of the variability of the data.

Mirror-touch was associated with all six subtypes of synesthesia (association with temporal sequence-color was marginally significant, depending on the level of statistical correction) and ticker tape was associated with every subtype except temporal sequence-color, and only marginally with grapheme-color.

= 0.035) but not BT although his data showed a trend in the same direction.

Related to this issue, results revealed that the effect of appetite was significant for choices of foods associated with go responses, but only marginally significant for choices associated with no-go responses.

In the case of egorrhea symptoms, as discussed above, having a strong conviction can work to some extent as a cultural adjustment, and suggests that a kind of delusion may be the extreme manifestation of cultural adjustment and a factor other than the presentation and conviction of symptoms may be significant to intervene.

Finally, there was a statistical trend for a group difference on the resolvable trials that was reminiscent of the significant differences we had observed before with a spatial probe and abstract stimuli (letters in locations, Experiment 2 in Harkin and Kessler, 2011 ).

A marginally significant group difference was observed in the task measuring spatial span (YA vs.