Excerpts

In addition, no significant correlation between childhood trauma severity and dissociation scores was established in Study 2, while it was highly significant in Study 1.

The results showed that the differences were in line with this hypothesis in the case of negative affect, but the effect was only marginally significant.

No other comparisons approached significance.

There was even a marginally significant trend for higher relational motivation for participants in the outgroup condition.

If on the one hand, 50 different T-patterns were detected in subjects under standard diet, on the other hand, 703 different T-patterns were discovered in animals under hyperglycidic treatment, with a highly significant increase of mean lengths and a significant reduction of mean occurrences of T-patterns.

However, when predicting negative affect, acceptance significantly attenuated the effect of the ambivalence manipulation on negative affect and a marginal trend for awareness to enhance the effect of the ambivalence manipulation on negative affect.

This may partly explain why certain results that showed a trend toward an improvement in self-perceived EI did not reach statistical significance after the practical training.

The meta-analysis performed with all studies and with all designs on scores of depression before and after the DMT interventions also indicate a favorable trend for DMT groups since scores of depression were decreased in all cases.

During action observation, the ANOVAs for three of the four ROIs revealed marginally significant interactions between the condition (exp/ctrl) and session (pre/post) factors.

(2013) , our results revealed a decreasing trend in patient performance in managing the different pragmatic tasks investigated, including sincere, deceitful, and ironic communicative acts in both comprehension and production on both the linguistic and extralinguistic scales of the ABaCo ( Angeleri et al., 2012 ).

The patients with schizophrenia also exhibited an increasing trend of difficulty in comprehending and producing sincere, deceitful, and ironic communicative acts expressed through either linguistic or extralinguistic means.

Notably, there was a marginally significant effect for the suppression condition, indicating a trend toward the EA group reporting greater use of suppression relative to the WE group.

Although, in each of the three brain structures, more than 300 genes showed nominally significant left-right differences in their expression patterns, none survived correction for multiple testing.

However, this interaction between grammaticality and adjective choice was only marginally significant ( t = −1.95).

There is no “objective” indicator for the extent of difference required to be deemed “non-trivial.” Therefore, we followed the guideline that effect size benchmarks for “practically significant” effects should be determined based on evidence from the specific research context (Hill et al., 2008 ; Keefer et al., 2013 ).

Using a paired sample Wilcoxon sign-rank test (non-parametric test), the results for naturalized respondents showed hardly significant changes in the average value for identification with Germany over this period: indifference profile ( n = 25; T = 85.50, ns ); partial integration profile ( n = 36; T = 230.00, ns ); assimilation profile ( n = 15; T = 35.00, ns ); separation profile ( n = 22; T = 52.00, ns ).

Although marginally significant, our results tend to confirm this result: our thirsty subjects exhibited an increased RT (+28 ms) in trials toward a candle glass when the preceding trial in the sequence was a no-go trial toward a glass of water, whereas the control group showed a decreased (−34 ms).

On the other hand, because many significance tests were conducted, some p -values may be significant by chance assuming that the distributions are the same across the High-to-Low and Low-to-High versions.

Because effect of ownership on implicit attitude change was shown to be highly significant in the previous research ( Maister et al., 2013 ), ownership was considered as a variable in the analysis.

All nine BRIEF-A subscales had moderate to strong and highly significant correlations with the ASRS-6 score ( Supplementary Table S3 ).

(2009) whom reported that low socially anxious participants displayed more pro-social behavior after rejection, whereas HSAs showed a trend toward less pro-social behavior.

This interaction means that the negativity was strong at medial electrodes, but only marginally significant at more lateral electrodes.

Although the relation between science intrinsic value and future STEM occupational aspirations was only marginally significant, the effect size was rather large, suggesting a link between interest and STEM aspirations in young students.

Analyses showed that adherence was significantly different between conditions when the cutaneous and visual (only a trend) imagery abilities were introduced as moderators (although the interaction was marginally significant in the case of the visual imagery ability).

Based on 21 samples ( n = 7,947), a meta-analysis of random effects demonstrated a moderately significant weighted effect size ( r = 0.365) and was found to be a good predictor of academic performance.