Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,614 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Generally, the VIs had a better relationship with Pn at the jointing–booting stage, but the r value became worse as the growth stage advanced; however, it might be that the number of samples was relatively small and therefore no VIs passed the highly significant correlation test ( p < 0.01).
highly significantP<0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant positive correlation (P<0.01) was observed between maize root morphology (length: r=0.959, 0.970, and 0.947; surface area: r=0.947, 0.956, and 0.980) and the activities of key antioxidant enzymes (SOD, APX, GR), suggesting that root system development substantially enhances the maize enzymatic antioxidant capacity.
marginally significantP = 0.0110.2× alphagold
Consequently, in central populations, the HE value of late-opening flowers decreased from 1.65 to 1.45 mm in the S-morph and from 1.53 to 1.27 mm in the L-morph, but the RHE value showed no significant decline in the S-morph ( P > 0.05) and only a marginally significant decrease in the L-morph ( P = 0.011).
a significant trendP=0.0220.4× alphagold
During the survey period, community biomass increased in May and June, and decreased from July to September, with a significant trend in August (loss rate 2.61g year -1 ; Supplementary Figure 3 (a); F 1,28 = 28.3, P=0.022; R 2 = 0.18) and September (loss rate 3.97g year -1 ; Supplementary Figure 3 (a); F 1,24 = 24.9, P=0.003; R 2 = 0.34).
an apparent trendP < 0.0270.5× alphagold
For F 1 -infected plants, differences in virus accumulation in leaves were less consistent, with an apparent trend suggesting intermediate levels of accumulation between those of P R and P S ; statistically significant differences ( P < 0.027; Kruskal-Wallis tests) were found among the three accessions at 16 dpi in basal leaves and at 23 and 30 dpi in intermediate leaves ( Figure 1B ).
a negative trendp=0.040.8× alphagold
Local temperature presented positive trends over time (R 2 = 0.15 and R 2 = 0.2, p<0.04), as vapor pressure (CRU regional data; R 2 = 0.1, p=0.07), AMO and TSA (global variables; R 2 = 0.5 and R 2 = 0.1, p<0.04), while local precipitation presented a negative trend over time (R 2 = 0.11, p=0.04). 3.5 SAVI, lakes and snow-ice cover relationships The cross correlation between SAVI and lake areas showed a positive association between the complete series in the current and subsequent quarters ( Figure S7 ), with SAVI seasonal fluctuations more pronounced than in lakes, as observed in Figures 2B, D .