Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,614 sentences · 1 filter applied

polyploidization RNA-seq dwarf plant hormone hybrid sweetgum National Forestry and Grassland Administration Promotion Project of China 2020133102 In stage I, the height of tetraploids only increased by 1.93 mm, while the diploids grew rapidly; in stage II, a significant difference was apparent ( Figure 1B ).
The qRT-PCR results demonstrated that the expression levels of lignin biosynthesis genes including PtrPAL4 , PtrC4H1 , PtrC3H3 , Ptr4CL5 , PtrCCoAOMT3 , PtrCOMT2 , PtrCCR2 , PtrCAld5H2 , and PtrCAD1 , lignin polymerization genes including PtrLAC19 , PtrLAC21 , PtrLAC26 , and PtrLAC41 , and hemicellulose biosynthesis genes including PtrGT43A , PtrGT47C , and PtrGT8F , increased at extremely significant levels, while the expression levels of the cellulose biosynthesis genes such as PtrCESA4 , PtrCESA7 , and PtrCESA8 , had no obvious increases in PtrWOX13A transgenic lines compared with WT ( Figure 6A ).
tomentosa , including the glycoside derivatives of pelargonidin, cyanidin, and peonidin, of which pelargonidin 3- O -glucoside was extremely significant different between WP and RP (1361.97-fold, Figures 2C , D ; Supplementary Table 2 ).
highly significantqualifiedgold
According to the vertical distribution of roots, the roots of allelopathic rice were concentrated mainly in the top 0–5 cm soil layer, and their contents quickly decreased with depth, while highly significant differences were observed in the root measures of allelopathic rice at 0–5 cm depth.
This was stronger than the positive and marginally significant correlation observed between quantitative-genetic divergence (Q ST_B ) and SSR genetic divergence (F ST ) between the pairs of SSR-derived groups (REML r = 0.670, n = 10; L 95% = 0.070, U 95% = 0.914; p = 0.034; Spearman-rank ρ = 0.636; p = 0.048) ( Figure 7 ).
highly significantqualifiedgold
To accompany the analysis of relationship between accumulation of H 2 O 2 and TBARS in context of proline accumulation ( Figure 2 ), the relative response of H 2 O 2 was subtracted from relative response in TBARS and the simple linear regression showed highly significant relationship ( R 2 = 0.876) between this difference and the proline accumulation ( Figure 4 ).
When the effect of groundwater level storage treatment without any salinity (W 0 S 0 , W 1 S 0 , and W 2 S 0 ) was analyzed, a clear trend in GI and VI was observed: dry storage (95.9% ± 3.6 and 85.9% ± 4.7%, respectively) > high groundwater level storage (49.3% ± 9.9 and 51.9% ± 7.1%) > low groundwater level storage (30.1% ± 9.3 and 35.7% ± 5.4%) ( Figure 4 ).