Although the p-value did not reach statistical significance (typically considered as p < 0.05), the correlation coefficient suggests a weak-to-moderate positive association between sTILs and TB.
Excerpts
All 14 parameters were found to be highly significant (p≤0.05) during the statistical analysis.
The relationship between variables and outcome was calculated; age, GCS on admission, and Rotterdam score on admission showed a positive trend (p-value < 0.05) while gender, mode of injury, and time since injury didn’t show any positive relationship (p-value > 0.05).
Results Microhardness analysis The ANOVA test showed that there is a highly significant difference in microhardness of tested groups at p ≤ 0.05 (Table 1 ).
A highly significant difference was found between difficulty level and the use of CMB (P < 0.05) and SMB (P = 0.000) (Table 2 ).
There was a highly significant difference in participants’ satisfaction between all bleaching groups (p < 0.05).
Although parathyroid hormone levels were higher in the NAS and NASH groups compared to the control group, these differences did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.050).
Paired t-test showed a highly significant difference between pre- and post-test scores ( P < 0.05).
However, the results were of borderline significance (RR 0.58; 95% CI (0.34, 1.01); p=0.05; I 2 =0%), as depicted in Figure 9 .
close to significancep = .050
The main effect of time was close to significance [F (2,56) = 3.163, p = .050].
41.5%) and reached borderline significance (p=0.05).
Diabetes mellitus and ocular tuberculosis had the largest coefficients (3.13 and 2.07) but both failed to reach significance at p<0.05 (Tables 3 - 5 ).
The decrease from baseline observed from time point T30 onwards was highly significant (p < 0.05).
Similarly, the change in platelet distribution width showed a decreasing trend among the survivors compared to an increasing trend among the non-survivors (p<0.05).
Nevertheless, the difference failed to reach statistical significance (treatment policy estimand; ETD, 5.30; 95% CI, -0.01 to 10.62; P=0.05).
Sedation and intubation parameters A highly significant difference was observed in OASS scores, with Group I achieving better sedation (p < 0.05).
Age and degree of PEM were found to be significantly associated with vitamin D levels (p = 0.024 and p = 0.043, respectively), with highly significant results (p < 0.05) (Table 8 ).
Lower Vitamin D levels showed a borderline significant association with abnormal HRUS (p=0.050) and were strongly associated with higher SPADI-Disability scores (p=0.001).
Subgroup analysis indicated a borderline significant benefit for the FMR+ablative fractional laser (AFL) combination (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 0.99-7.71, p=0.05) but not for FMR+non-ablative fractional laser (NAFL).
Regarding the individual predictors, the morphological characteristics assessed by the ATLFF demonstrated a positive trend in relation to the number of symptoms (β = 0.342, t = 2.002, p = 0.050), although this association was not strictly statistically significant at the conventional alpha level (p < 0.05).
When all etiologies were pooled, the mean difference of 0.14 in scores between F2-4 and F1-0 fibrosis for AST/ALT was marginally significant (p=0.05).
This trend was reflected in our meta-analysis, which showed a borderline significant reduction in the odds of requiring mechanical ventilation in vitamin D-sufficient patients (p=0.05), further reinforcing the potential respiratory benefits of adequate vitamin D levels in this population.
slightly non-significantp > 0.05
Slightly non-significant increases in systolic blood pressure (SBP) values were observed at 90 seconds in both C and R groups (p > 0.05) post laryngoscopy (Table 8 ).
borderline significancep = 0.05
Septations were more frequently identified on MRI (32, 47.8%) than on USG (23, 34.3%), showing borderline significance (p = 0.05).
showed a trendp=0.05
The reduction in fetal body weight in the progesterone-reduced group at 21 dg did not reach statistical significance (p=0.07) but showed a trend to reduce (Mann-Kendall test; correlation=0.8, p=0.05).