Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,685 sentences · 1 filter applied

a numerical trendp = 0.122.4× alphagold
However, early relapses (within the first 2 months of adjuvant treatment, n = 17) proved particularly difficult, with a significant reduction in the second PFS (PFS2, HR 1.83, p = 0.029) ( Figure 4 C) and a numerical trend for reduced OS2 (HR 1.77, p = 0.12), compared to relapses that had occurred after 2 months (n = 124).
borderline significantp = 0.142.8× alphagold
Patients with higher score of the immune response module IMMUNE1 showed no significant tamoxifen benefit (HR (95% CI) = 0.67 (0.34–1.33)), whereas patients with low IMMUNE1 score did (HR (95% CI) = 0.35 (0.20–0.61)) with borderline significant interaction test in univariate ( p = 0.14) and multivariable analyses ( p = 0.09) ( Figure 6 E,F).
showed a trendp = 0.1422.8× alpha
CEUS to absolute dose applied (per cycle 1; Supplementary Tables S2 and S4 ) showed a trend (correlation coefficient r = 0.498, p = 0.142), and DCE-MRI VVF measurements showed a significant correlation with absolute dose applied per cycle 1 (r = 0.556, p = 0.038) but not with dose level per m 2 , whereas k-trans measurements only showed trends.
marginal significancep = 0.153.0× alphagold
Among the thirteen lncRNAs, ENST00000671612.1 correlated with worse refractory free survival (RFS); p value = 0.01; and HR = 2.0 (1.1–3.7), as presented in Figure 10 a,b, while ENST00000520619.1 exhibited marginal significance in predicting RFS ( p = 0.15, supplementary Figure S1 ).
showed a trendp = 0.1523.0× alpha
CPS 10–49 showed a trend toward shorter survival compared to CPS ≥50 (HR, 2.28; 95% CI, 0.74–7.00; p = 0.152), although this difference was not statistically significant, possibly due to the limited sample size. 3.6.