Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,685 sentences · 1 filter applied

Two-tailed Bonferroni corrected p < 7.35 × 10 −4 (0.05/68) for UKB and p < 5.32 × 10 −4 (0.05/94) for ChinaPCa were considered statistically significant, while the p -value between Bonferroni correction and 0.05 was deemed marginally significant on SNP association analysis.
highly significantqualifiedgold
Indeed, we found a highly significant reduction of green fluorescence in NCCR reporter transduced MKL-1 cells upon PHT treatment, suggesting repression of MCPyV early gene transcription, while late gene transcription showed a slight, but statistically not significant, increase ( Figure 1 e).
Less closely aligned with observations of most [ 2 , 14 , 19 ], but not all [ 16 ], of the four previously published studies and of the single case report [ 20 ] examining the issue in patients with higher tumor burdens, our findings suggest only a possible trend towards a tumor sink effect of PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals in the liver.
The comparison between histotypes showed that both the intracellular and vascular fractions tended to be higher in tumours with high cellularity (glioblastoma and metastasis), and quantitative analysis showed a trend toward higher values of the intracellular fraction (fic) within the tumour core with increasing glioma grade.
highly significantqualifiedgold
In that study, an EpiSwitch systemic biomarker associated with regulation of the POU2F2 locus provided highly significant binary baseline calls for benefit from treatment with Avelumab in combination with best supportive care (BSC) against the control arm of BSC alone, demonstrating a Hazard Ratio of 0.44.
The results showed a trend towards a higher ORR in children than in adults, with 86.59% and 76.32%, respectively, a trend towards a higher ORR in the low morphologic relapse population than in the high morphologic recurrence relapse population, with 85.54% and 74.08%, respectively, and a trend towards a lower incidence of CRS and neurotoxicity in allogeneic T-cells than in autologous T-cells, with 72.00% vs. 88.66% and 41.4% vs. 21.47%, respectively; however, none of these results showed a significant difference because their 95% CIs mostly overlapped. 3.5.