Excerpts

Significant ( p < .05) or marginally significant ( p < .10) differences existed on parental BMI for parents’ and children’s steps/day.

Borderline significance (0.05 < P < 0.1) was found in the comparison of urinary 8-OHdG levels between male and female control subjects, electroplating workers with different alcohol consumption status, as well as in the comparison of Olive tail moment and tail DNA% between male and female electroplating workers and among different age groups of electroplating workers.

Post-estimation tests show that in model a (ages 60–70) mortality in the shortest duration band is statistically significantly different from the longest duration band for males ( HR = 2.48 ; p < 0.05) and marginally significant for females ( HR = 3.71 ; p < 0.10).

Statistical significance was set at the p = 0.05 level and borderline significance was set at p ≤ 0.10 for all tests.

Variables that were significant or approaching significance with p ≤0.10 in their respective univariate models were considered as covariates in the multivariable models.

The partial suppression of the beneficial health effect of Dutch language proficiency by perceived discrimination was borderline significant ( p < .1).

There was marginally significant evidence ( p < .1) that perceived discrimination suppressed the positive association between Dutch language proficiency and mental health.

On the other hand, those belonging to other castes had 0.809 times lower chances, suggesting a modest decrease in the probability of receiving JSY benefit compared to the ST category, which was marginally significant ( p < 0.1).

Marginally significant variables ( p ≤ 0.10) in univariate analysis were included in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model to identify risk behavior factors associated with HIV incidence [ 27 ] after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics.

In Model I, the mediation effect was not significant (B = 0.004, t = 0.888), while in Model II, the mediation effect was marginally significant (B = 0.012, t = 1.596, p < 0.10).

However, in Model III, the mediation effect approached significance (B = 0.043, t = 1.330, p < 0.10), suggesting that in low-density, large campuses, convenience may play a more substantial role in mediating the relationship between depression and perceived restorative effects.

Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 but because of the relatively small sample size, marginally significant results ( p < 0.10) were also reported.

A trend towards significance (p < 0.10) was found for self-efficacy for reaching the physical activity guidelines.

Odds ratio values varied between 1.10 and 1.23 and were statistically significant (p<.05) in fifteen cases, borderline significant (p<.10) in two cases and not significant (p=.15) in one.

In these tests age, sex, and co-morbidity will be included as covariates, in addition to those other potentially confounding variables that will show an at least marginally significant (p < .10) difference between groups.

The variables that were marginally significant with P < 0.10 in the univariate analysis were eligible for entry into the multivariable logistic regression.

Because the sample size is small, associations with borderline significance (0.5 < p < 0.10) are also reported.

Multivariate analysis of significant or nearly significant effects (p < 0.1) of lifestyle variables concerned in this study (maternal age over 35 or under 17, being single mother, primiparity, smoking during pregnancy, history of infertility, previous miscarriages, previous induced abortions, short time or long time since previous pregnancy or using IUD before this pregnancy) was based on multiple logistic regression analysis (BMDP Statistical Software Inc., Los Angeles, CA).

At office level, only one random coefficient for the constant turned out to be weakly significant (P ≤ 0.10; for NCSE), indicating that there was a small systematic difference for this outcome measure between offices.

Variables with Associations of Borderline Significance (0.05 ≤ p < 0.10) ​​ WindU10 ( β = -2.18, p = 0.052; OR = 0.11) showed a negative association with a trend towards significance.

[ 33 ] found a positive association (reported by authors as marginally significant at p < 0.10) between exposure to post hurricane-related (Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005) stressors and increased AU in individuals with a history of low income (estimate = 58.41, standard error (SE) = 31.45), but not among individuals with a history of middle income.

Age showed a nonsignificant trend towards lower stress at higher age (B = − 0.04, p = 0.106).

Despite approaching significance, bivariate analyses did not reveal a significant difference in criminogenic risk levels ( p = .11, Cramer’s V = 0.24).

Although Ace and Ant became marginally significant ( P = 0.111 and 0.096 , respectively), likely owing to reduced statistical power from the smaller number of incident cases at the higher threshold, their effect directions and magnitudes (ORs) remained stable.

In contrast, the marginally non-significant p-value for the mental health index ( p = 0.12) indicated that OLS and IV estimates did not differ substantially for this outcome, implying weaker endogeneity concerns.