Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,451 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally non-significantp = .0711.4× alpha
For social loneliness, the interaction was marginally non-significant (F(4, 3975) = 2.16, p = .071), but post hoc comparisons revealed a clear gradient: All pairwise limitation comparisons were significant in the middle-aged group ( p s < 0.007), two of three were significant in the 66–79 group, and none reached significance in the 80 + group.
of borderline significancep = 0.0751.5× alpha
In a non-prespecified analysis it heterogeneity was detected between Māori males and females in kit return rates ( p = 0.035); this was of borderline significance for Pacific ( p = 0.075), with a stronger negative effect on participation observed in males than females.
marginally non-significantP = 0.0751.5× alpha
Results The prevalence of LTBI was 50.5% (95% CI: 46%, 55%) with no significant gender difference (49.8% among males versus 51.2% among females; Chi-square (χ 2 ) = 0.10; P = 0.41) and marginally non-significant increasing trends with age (44.6% among those below 24 years and 59.7% in the age range of 45-64 years; χ 2 = 6.91; P = 0.075).
only marginally significantp = 0.0751.5× alphagold
Further, although having tried to quit using drugs in the past six months was associated with higher resilience in the unadjusted model (B = 4.72, p = 0.092), this association was only marginally significant after adjusting for confounders (B = 4.98, p = 0.075).
marginally statistically significantp = 0.0771.5× alphagold
Although the differences were small and only marginally statistically significant (Student’ t-test p = 0.077 to 0.131 between within 1 st and outside of 2 nd ring groups depending on which cutoff is used), there was consistency with differences in mean BMI between categories for students aged 16 to 17.
approached significancep = 0.0781.6× alpha
In Step two the CCS-CA is linked with depression as measured by the CESD-R ( p < 0.001), and although risk for substance use and abuse approached significance as measured by CAGE-AID ( p = 0.078) it is not reported here, but the reason for this finding is discussed.