Co-treatment with BM-MSCs and beetroot created markedly significant ( p ≤ 0.05) decrease (127.8 ± 22.78 pg/mL) over the Cis group ( Figure 5 ). 3.2.4.
Excerpts
Conversely, the relative abundances of certain beneficial bacteria in the T2 group increased or showed an increasing trend, e.g., Bifidobacterium ( p < 0.05), Lactobacillus ( p = 0.298), Bacillus ( p = 0.550) ( Figure 2 C).
A highly significant estrus induction rate was found by the investigation ( p < 0.05) after the application of epidural injection of Receptal in the R epid group (26 of 30, 86%), and the average time from treatment to the onset of estrus was 7 ± 1.27 days.
approached significancep = 0.05
High CM horses had significantly shorter gluteal activity duration across both limbs than Low CM horses p < 0.05) and a significantly later TrH activity onset event prior to landing ( p = 0.02), which approached significance for LdH ( p = 0.05) ( Table 2 and Table S3 ).
The survival rate showed a highly significant enhancement in control and fucoidan-fed groups compared with ATZ or fucoidan/ATZ groups ( p < 0.05).
In addition, the differences between the DMD values of the free and microencapsulated form of the same product during different time intervals were highly significant ( p < 0.05), excluding the comparison at 0 h for Olistat-Cyn (20.9 vs. 17.7%; p = 0.989) and Olistat-P (18.3 vs. 14.4%; p = 0.809). 3.2.
close to significancep = 0.0504
showed a trendp = 0.0643
The type of horse showed a trend in the multivariable analysis, ordinal scale ( p = 0.0643), and was close to significance in the multivariable analysis, nominal scale, ( p = 0.0504) ( Table 2 and Table 5 ).
close to significancep = 0.051
Dose Response The fixed effect time by groups interaction was close to significance for the MI-CAT(V) total score (Type III p = 0.051) sustained by the univariate analysis of the Gr.
BAL neutrophil percentage was retained in the final model since it improved model fit, and, although statistical significance was not reached, a negative trend of association with the number of wins was observed ( p = 0.051).
When eating hay, it was found that there was a strong trend for more bites per minute for the double attachment compared to single attachment ( p = 0.051), which was likely the result of a significantly reduced amount of grams extracted per bite (single: 1.9 ± 0.2; double: 1.4 ± 0.1).
Comparison of plasma cortisol concentrations between months showed marginally significant differences (F (3,43) = 2.809; p = 0.051) between the first and last months of the hunting season ( Figure 1 a).
marginally non-significantp = 0.051
Second, ANOSIM analysis showed that overall microbial community separation among treatments was marginally non-significant (R = 0.17, p = 0.051).
Growth Performance As shown in Table 3 , there was an increasing trend in ADG of Ira rabbits in the MOA group compared to the CON group ( p = 0.051).
Moreover, Gln-D, GLU-D, or SR had no effect on transcript levels of the anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 at three time points ( p > 0.05), but a decreasing trend was found at 24 h ( p = 0.051).
almost significantlyp = 0.051
Additionally, the abundances of Ruminococcaceae bacterium D16 and Turicibacter sanguinis were found to be almost significantly decreased in the lean-line chickens compared to the fat-line ( p = 0.051 and 0.052, respectively; Figure 2 A).
One pathway that approached significant enrichment was the peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway ( p = 0.051).
marginally non-significantp = 0.051
Despite there not being a statistically significant difference between the two groups, this difference could also be classified as marginally non-significant (Mann–Whitney U test, U = 5.5, critical value of U is 5, Z = 1.64, p = 0.051).
Body weight gain (BWG) during days 1–21 tended to be higher in enzyme-supplemented groups compared with the control group; however, this difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.051).
very close to significancep = 0.051
The Shapiro–Wilk test for normality on the variable “mass gain” was very close to significance as well ( p = 0.051).
very close to significancep = 0.051
Noteworthy, the correlation between γ-GT and UREA, AST and BHBa (the latter very close to significance, p = 0.051) points to a certain involvement of liver function.
The final reduced model explained 27% of variability; however, the effect of the weight category was only marginally significant ( p = 0.0511), while the real health risk to humans remained insignificant.
approached significancep = 0.0512
For SNF%, the overall effect approached significance ( p = 0.0512).
All mahouts in private facilities had direct contact with their elephants, and almost all in government facilities; there was a statistical trend for more mahouts to use direct contact with the elephants in private facilities as compared with those in government zoos ( p = 0.0513).
On the other hand, propionate was not significant ( p = 0.1075), but it exhibited a marginally significant quadratic behavior ( p = 0.0513), showing a moderate increase during the EG-DPS14 (second period), due to a higher consumption of herbaceous plants that may present a lower availability of structural carbohydrates; in addition, the chemical composition of these plants presents a lower amount of indigestible fiber during the rainy season than in any other time of the year [ 48 ].
There was a borderline significant sex by resource guarding status interaction for likelihood of return ( X 2 = 3.80, d.f. = 1, p = 0.0514).