“marginally significant”

Overall, IM was more common in children of younger than of older mothers; the same was observed in those with IM aged 11 and over, though differences were marginally significant (p = 0.04) and fairly small (Table 2 ).

23 ) compared to AKIN0, AKIN2 recipients showed a marginally significant increase (RR 1.43; 95 % CI 1.04–1.95; p = 0.04) ( Fig. 24 ) whilst AKIN3 recipients had a 2.2-fold increase (RR 95 % CI: 1.95–2.48; p < 0.001) in DGF incidence ( Fig. 25 ).

The analyses revealed a marginally significant difference only for unstructured stimuli (unstructured: F (1,36) = 4.2, p = 0.04, LBF = 0.06; grouped: F (1,36) = 1.26, p = 0.27, η 2 = 0.03, LBF = − 0.4).

Table S4 indicates that the mediation effects between CRF and RAVLT could partially be accounted for by moderation, such that including the interaction terms led to a marginally significant R 2 change (= 0.013, p = 0.04), but neither interaction term had statistically significant coefficients. 4.

Non-significant association of presence AAC with ischemic stroke was found (1·02, 0·98-1·06, P=0·35), although the HR for severe AAC was marginally significant (1·05, 1·00-1·10, P=0·04).

An update presented at the 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting [ 8 ] reported a marginally significant ( P = 0.04) survival advantage for lymph node positive patients treated with letrozole.

In addition, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests revealed no significantly different fungal species (q < 0.05) between the SLE and SLE_post groups, except for a marginally significant change observed in Aspergillus terreus c60 ( p = 0.04, Table S10 ).

Despite showing no significant main effect of migraine ( F < 1), there was a marginally significant interaction effect, F (2, 106) = 3.32, p = .04.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in the databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, using the keywords “antibiotics” AND “prostatectomy” AND “urinary catheter.” Results: Three articles were identified having the scope of our review, with 1,040 patients, which were subjected to our meta-analysis revealing a marginally significant decrease in the risk of urinary infection after indwelling urinary catheter removal (odds ratio–OR = 0.51; 95% confidence interval–95%CI 0.27–0.98; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%).

We found that both the decrease in sensory information and the increase in categorical coding across cortical areas were well explained by their anatomical hierarchical level ( P ≤ 1 × 10 −5 for both), with only a marginally significant difference between them ( P = 0.04).

There was no significant difference in detecting IgM and IgG with Biolidics LFI and ELISA at D0 and D7 ( p = 1.00), except for marginally significant detection of IgM at D7 ( p = 0.04).

The secondary vectors mean outdoor host-seeking densities were marginally significant compared to the indoor densities for An. maculipalpis ( t 9 = 1.96, p < 0.04) and An. coustani s.l.

Only the parafunctional habit networks were marginally significant in global strength (S = 1.21, p = 0.04) ( Supplementary Material S4 ).

Women showed a marginally significant better survival when analyzed using the log-rank test ( p = 0.04).

We found changes in GATA3 activity were predicted to be significantly associated with severity as defined by the univariate model ( P = 1.62E-05), whereas RORA was marginally significant ( P = .04) and STAT1/2/4 and SMADs were not significant ( P > .05).

faecalis , we found a marginally significant increase in non-ICU departments (from 86.7% in 2013 to 90.6% in 2018; p = 0.04, data not shown), whereas no significant trend was observed among other subgroups (i.e. age, sex, region, hospital size and hospital type).

In these relatively small groups, metformin use was marginally significant but of a great magnitude of benefit in improving overall survival (OS) (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.0–8.4; p = .04); of note, there was no difference in RFS between the two groups.

Between-group weighted UniFrac distances were significant for vulture species (PERMANOVA F 4,56 = 3.78, R 2 = 0.20, P < 0.001), marginally significant for plumage tracts ( F 1,56 = 2.51, R 2 = 0.03, P = 0.04), but were non-significant for the interaction, vulture species × plumage tract ( F 4,56 = 0.90, R 2 = 0.05, P = 0.57).

However follow up bootstrap p values (based on 500 iterations) showed that the two cluster solution was marginally significant ( p = 0.04) whereas the three cluster solution was marginally non-significant ( p = 0.052) with the latter therefore a better fit to the data.

Expanding to the 14 days before incentives, we found a marginally significant difference (F(14, 49) = 1.98; p = 0.04), that was driven by slight differences between states with and without incentives in the 7–14 days before incentives were introduced.

However, at week 12, FEC was marginally significant ( P = 0.04) with the highest value recorded in KIG goats.

At the second step of the analysis, adding the emotional burden of loneliness significantly increased predicted variance in depression symptoms by 4.7% and the effect of loneliness frequency scores was reduced but remained marginally significant (β = 0.141, p = .04).

Pre-registered analyses isolated to false and true headlines revealed that the nudge was associated with a marginally significant reduction in false-headline sharing in both the 12.5% and 20% misinformation conditions; OR = 1.76, SE = 0.49, z = 2.05, p = 0.040 and OR = 1.70, SE = 0.40, z = 2.22, p = 0.026 respectively.

Interaction between treatment and continuous Trop-2 expression for OS was marginally significant (range, P = .04 to 0.05); interaction between treatment and Trop-2 H-score quartiles for OS was trending toward significance ( P = .054; Data Supplement, Table S5).

In terms of performance, there was a marginally significant decrease in overall performance (from 63% to 51%; z = 2.01; p = .04).