“marginally significant”

Secondly they showed a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.04) in the rate of lymph node involvement, with the highest being among Her2-overexpressing subtype (56%), followed by luminal B (47%), basal-like (41%), and luminal A (34%).

However, from Week 6 to Week 12 the intervention group showed a large decrease, while the scores in the control group remained relatively stable, leading to a marginally significant (p = 0.04) larger total decrease in perceived stress from Week 0 to Week 12 in the intervention group.

In the HFBS total score analysis, only agreeableness was a marginally significant predictor for a higher score (–0.75 [0.35], p = 0.04) ( Table 4 ).

Pooling autosomal mutations to compare against X mutations revealed a marginally significant difference in the autosomal versus X rate in PB306 ( P = 0.04, X 2 test) but not in the other three MA lines sets (0.30 < P < 0.86, X 2 tests).

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted in the databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, using the keywords “antibiotics” AND “prostatectomy” AND “urinary catheter.” Results: Three articles were identified having the scope of our review, with 1,040 patients, which were subjected to our meta-analysis revealing a marginally significant decrease in the risk of urinary infection after indwelling urinary catheter removal (odds ratio–OR = 0.51; 95% confidence interval–95%CI 0.27–0.98; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%).

We could not find any influence of biological sex on symptoms, PFTs parameters and HRCT abnormalities at all time points (data not shown), except for a marginally significant difference in the rate of anxiety (65.2% F vs 39% M, p = 0.04) at 6 months, that was not confirmed at 12 months.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 10.13039/501100000024 Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research 10.13039/100016810 National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002 U01DA041048 U01DA050989 U01DA051016 U01DA041022 U01DA051018 U01DA051037 U01DA050987 U01DA041174 U01DA041106 U01DA041117 U01DA041028 U01DA041134 U01DA050988 U01DA051039 U01DA041156 U01DA041025 U01DA041120 U01DA051038 U01DA041148 U01DA041093 U01DA041089 U24DA041123 U24DA041147 There was one marginally significant LDSC genetic correlation between Lack of Premeditation and Lack of Perseverance ( r g = 0.97, S.E. = 0.46, p = 0.04; Table S4 ) in ABCD.

Overall, IM was more common in children of younger than of older mothers; the same was observed in those with IM aged 11 and over, though differences were marginally significant (p = 0.04) and fairly small (Table 2 ).

When analysed according to study design, a significant increase in maternal homocysteine was observed among prospective studies (RoM: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.14–1.44, P = 3.2 × 10 −5 ), with a marginally significant effect among retrospective studies (RoM = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.00–1.14, P = 0.04) ( Figure 1 ).

Within the linear regression model for HAM-A and HAM-D, childhood trauma had a marginally significant effect on the HAM-A (β=0.15, SE=0.07, p=0.04) and HAM-D scores (β=0.12, SE=0.06, p=0.04), while no significant TPH2 703T main effect or interaction with childhood trauma was observed.

After sequential adjustment for demographic characteristics (sex, marital status, and race), smoking status, hearing impairment, and visual impairment (Models 2‐5), the HR for digital isolation was attenuated but remained marginally significant (eg, Model 5: HR 1.23; P =.04).

The results revealed that for young senders, relationship had a marginally significant effect on literality, χ 1 2 = 4.48, p = 0.04; this was true in old senders, χ 1 2 = 17.15, p < 0.001.

Increasing the curing time from 20 to 40 seconds had a marginally significant effect ( p ≤ 0.040) on the DC of both bulk fill and universal studied RBC samples.

Occupation reveals a marginally significant association ( p = 0.04), though the Likelihood Ratio ( p = 0.14) suggests weaker evidence.

This relationship is marginally significant ( P = .04), suggesting a weak positive association between occupation and FABQ-PA.

A marginally significant association was found between the risk of HTN with the total intake of BCAAs (OR = 1.018, CI95%: 1.001–1.035, P = 0.04), leucine (OR = 1.040, CI95%:1.002–1.080, P = 0.03), isoleucine (OR = 1.068, CI95%:1.001–1.140, P = 0.04), and valine (OR = 1.060, CI95%:1.003–1.121, P = 0.04).

An additional three test results were marginally significant: “aspartic-type peptidase activity” ( Z = 1.75, p = 0.040, q = 0.060), “ATP:ADP antiporter activity” ( Z = 1.54, p = 0.062, q = 0.083), and total proportion of carnivory-associated functions ( Z = 1.79, p = 0.036, q = 0.060).

Genes DUSP10, NUDT1 and PPTRE showed marginally significant reduction ( p = 0.04), and gene DUSP11 showed more pronounced reduction beyond control ( p = 0.003).

In pairwise session comparisons, we found no effect of session on model-free or model-based control or on the balance between model-based and model-free control (all p > 0.14), except for a marginally significant increase in model-free control in session 3 compared to session 1 (p = 0.04).

There were significant or marginally significant improvements from Follow-ups #2 to #3 after the booster training in the prevalence of the 2 items (54% to 88% for ability to define obesity, P = .040; and 58% to 88% for ability to screen patients, P = .079).

Both strains had a marginally significant methanol-specific growth effect at 24 h with an increase of 22% for BY4741 (p = 0.04) and an increase of 23% for CEN.PK (p = 0.05) ( Fig. 2 A and 2B).

Pooling the data assessing OS for 2138 patients from all included studies revealed marginally significant difference between CRT and RT alone (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.45-0.98, P = 0.04) and significant between-study heterogeneity ( P = 0.09).

Nevertheless, when the exercise interventions were divided between those lasting 30 min or less (SMD = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.31–0.63; p < 0.001) and those lasting more than 30 min (SMD = 0.81; 95%CI: 0.53–1.09; p < 0.001), a marginally significant difference was observed ( p = 0.04), thus supporting the hypothesis that 30 min of exercise is the minimal threshold for producing significant BDNF variations.

In the male group, the correlation was marginally significant only for the R-BMD ( r = 0.25, p = 0.04); other BMD indices did not correlate with CAP.

Similarly, when shark were excluded from the analysis, the Se-Hg:Se relationship for fish became marginally significant (F 1,8 = 5.7, P = 0.04) and Se content explained 41% of the variation in molar Hg:Se.