Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
The main effect of space typology was marginally significant (Wilks’ Λ = 0.80, F(2,29) = 3.62, p = 0.04), with Nodal spaces (6939.34 ms) showing significantly longer fixation durations than Path spaces (6601.19 ms, Δ = 338.15 ms, p = 0.01), which contrasts with the non-significant difference in PRS scores between Nodal and Path spaces, suggesting that although Nodal spaces have longer fixation durations, their attention restoration efficiency is lower (PRS score = 68.03).
marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
Analyses were re-performed with multivariate outliers, and the results did not change except for the path between violence at time 2 predicting perfectionistic strivings at time 3 that became marginally significant (β = 1.23, p = 0.04) For the second model estimating the cross-lagged effect of perfectionistic concerns on violence towards the offspring, it showed adequate fit (χ 2 (4) = 80.5, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.87; TLI = 0.53; RMSEA = 0.29, 95% CI = [0.24, 0.34], SRMR = 0.06).
marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
The determinant measures which were significant or marginally significant positive contributors for PH include Health Responsibility ( p = 0.04), Physical Activity ( p < 0.01), Nutrition ( p = 0.03), and Spiritual Growth ( p = 0.02).
A Model of Health for Family Caregivers of Elders.
Healthcare (Basel) · 2016 · PMC5371907
marginally significantp=0.0400.8× alphagold
Pairwise comparisons identified a significant difference between the Norm-Dependent and Assertive Decisiveness subgroups (adjusted p=0.005), a marginally significant difference between the Hesitant to Act and Norm-Dependent subgroups (adjusted p=0.040) and no significant difference between the Hesitant to Act and Assertive Decisiveness subgroups (adjusted p=0.602).
marginally significantp = 0.040.8× alphagold
Finally, the potential overlap of participants in the studies included in our meta‐analysis may have contributed to the marginally significant findings of plasma Aβ42 between the DS with and without AD groups ( z = 2.03, p = 0.04). 4.2 Tau In this meta‐analysis, we examined two forms of tau and found no significant differences in plasma t‐tau (non‐phosphorylated tau) and p‐tau181 (phosphorylated tau) concentrations between the DS population and the euploid controls.
marginally significantp = 0.0400.8× alphagold
Pre-registered analyses isolated to false and true headlines revealed that the nudge was associated with a marginally significant reduction in false-headline sharing in both the 12.5% and 20% misinformation conditions; OR = 1.76, SE = 0.49, z = 2.05, p = 0.040 and OR = 1.70, SE = 0.40, z = 2.22, p = 0.026 respectively.