Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = 0.0641.3× alphagold
They had lower abstract reflection [ F (1, 62) = 7.81, p = 0.007, η 2 p = 0.112]; higher –although marginally significant– referential activity [ F (1, 62) = 3.56, p = 0.064, η 2 p = 0.054], and the covariation between referential and reflection/reorganization activities [ F (1, 32) = 3.74, p = 0.058, η 2 p = 0.057].
marginally significantP = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Language network average clustering coefficient was also a significant predictor of Phonology [ Estimate = −8.100, 95% CI = (−15.662, −0.538), P = 0.036] and Semantics [ Estimate = 9.036, 95% CI = (1.249, 16.823), P = 0.023], and a marginally significant predictor of Lexical syntax [ Estimate = 8.777, 95% CI = (−0.501, 18.055), P = 0.064].
marginally significantp = 0.0641.3× alphagold
Comparing the two pulse-timings showed a marginally significant main effect of pulse timing ( F (1,7) = 4.820; p = 0.064) indicating that applying TMS pulses early, directly at the offset of the stimulus display, resulted in larger recall errors (24.23° on average) than TMS applied midway through the retention interval (23.4° on average) Audible ‘clicks’ from a TMS machine can have differential attentional cuing effects when presented at different time points [ 44 ], and thus have the potential to influence behavior differently early versus late during a memory delay.
marginally significantp = 0.0641.3× alphagold
The indirect path revealed that a lack of companion support increases (marginally significant) the likelihood of experiencing mistreatment during childbirth (β = 1.26, 95% CI -0.10 – 2.62; p = 0.064), which in turn raises the odds of postpartum anxiety and depression symptoms by 1.05 times (95% CI 1.02 - 1.08; p < 0.001) for each unit increase in mistreatment ( Fig 2A ).
marginally significantp = 0.0641.3× alphagold
For salivary cortisol a marginally significant main effect of time was found [ F (3, 171) = 2.4579, p = 0.064; 4 participants were excluded from cortisol analysis due to insufficient saliva samples], according to post-hoc analysis, we found a marginally significant peak in cortisol level in the final sample (S4) as compared to post “rest 1” sample (S1, p = 0.057).