“marginally significant”

At step 4, the interactions term for five dimensions of dispositional mindfulness and test anxiety contributed a marginally significant 5% additional variance in gamma, F (5, 183) = 2.13, p = .064.

The overall difference between the three accommodation categories was marginally significant, H (2) = 5.495, p = 0.064, although people living in rehabilitation centres (158.08) and rental accommodation (148.75) had higher mean rank than that of people living in owned accommodation (129.75).

Besides a marginally significant interaction effect for TS at the calf (F = 2.988; p = 0.064), Bonferroni post hoc analysis of this interaction effect revealed an effect of time: reduced TS (i.e., less pain facilitation) after aerobic exercise compared to pre-exercise but only in the no medication condition (mean difference 0.938 (SE 0.397) p = 0.024).

Moreover, a marginally significant effects due to age was detected [ F (2, 32) = 2.996, p = 0.064].

The association between Tiam1 expression and tumor position was marginally significant ( P = 0.064).

Those with borderline personality disorder had a marginally significant increase in suicidal events in the first 5 years ( p = 0.064), increasing to a significant increase at 12 years ( p = 0.003) but not at 30 years.

For positive emotion ratings, results revealed a marginally significant main effect of manipulation, F (1, 27) = 3.73, p = 0.064, and a significant main effect of time, F (5, 135) = 6.76, p < 0.001 ( Fig. 1 B).

Furthermore, a marginally significant 3-way interaction between time window, task, and transition type was observed, F 1,15 = 3.36; P = 0.064.

The main effect of Direction was marginally significant, F (2,59) = 2.896, p = 0.064, ƞp 2 = 0.094.

This correlation remained marginally significant after controlling for the mean age and sex ratio of the sample in each BPS paper ( r = .27, p = .064).

In addition, contact with real robots had a marginally significant influence (β = -0.09, p = 0.064), indicating a reducing effect on people’s negative expectancies (partly supporting hypothesis 2a; hypothesis 3b is not supported).

Language network average clustering coefficient was also a significant predictor of Phonology [ Estimate = −8.100, 95% CI = (−15.662, −0.538), P = 0.036] and Semantics [ Estimate = 9.036, 95% CI = (1.249, 16.823), P = 0.023], and a marginally significant predictor of Lexical syntax [ Estimate = 8.777, 95% CI = (−0.501, 18.055), P = 0.064].

Association between HER-2 Immunoreactivity and Clinicopathological Parameters The overexpression of HER-2 was associated with poorly differentiated tumors, but this correlation was marginally significant ( P = 0.064).

There was a marginally significant interaction between empathy and SIO, [ β =0.11, t (170)=0.1.87, p =0.064 (−0.01, 0.33)].

For low-intensity anger recognition, a marginally significant positive association was observed only at low levels of abuse ( b = 0.05, t = 1.86, 95% CI [−0.0031, 0.1060], p =.064).

The isolation by distance pairwise test on regional samples was significant upon the outlier marker subset ( Y = 3 × 10 −5 X + 0.0034; R 2 = 0.6218; p = 0.020) and marginally significant upon the full marker set admixture (Y = 5 × 10 −6 X + 0.0126; R 2 = 0.3565; p = 0.064).

Only a marginally significant correlation was found between PDGFRA mRNA and lymph node metastasis ( p = 0.064). 2.2.

A significant difference was detected in normal ( P <0.001) and sharp linger ( P =0.004) responses to cold test with a marginally significant difference for no responses ( P =0.064) between two histological treatable and untreatable groups.

We also observed a marginally significant decrease of 5.3% ( p <0.064) for in-person primary care visits among the overall treatment population.

An ANOVA test did not find significant main effects of time as measured by Shannon Entropy and Simpson’s Index (P>0.05; Supplementary Table S4C.2 ), but found marginally significant main effects of time as measured by richness and phylogenetic diversity (P=0.064 and P=0.078; Supplementary Table S4C.2 ).

The interaction between Language × Direction was marginally significant [ F (1,19) = 3.882, p = 0.064], as FW Tagalog gave rise to a decrease in oxyHb (inverted response), whereas FW and BW English as well as BW Tagalog resulted in an increase in oxyHb (canonical response; significant and marginal Bonferroni post hoc tests: FW Tagalog versus BW Tagalog p = 0.002; FW Tagalog versus FW English p = 0.054; FW Tagalog versus BW English p = 0.077; Figure 7 ).

The two-way interaction between Overlap and Prime Type was marginally significant ( t = 1.91, p = 0.064).

When stratified by race/ethnicity, this positive trend indicating an increasing association of caregiving and health as income increased was present in Hispanics (p < 0.001) and also in Blacks, though marginally significant (p = 0.064).

Kano and Kaduna Q6 MMR had significantly lower MMR (p = 0.0074 and p = 0.0001, respectively) and Katsina’s Q6 MMR was substantially lower (p = 0.0641, marginally significant) than their Q3 baselines.

The mean bundle implementation index score of the severe hypertension in pregnancy safety bundle for urban hospitals was higher compared to rural hospitals; however, the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.0643).