“marginally significant”

In addition, contact with real robots had a marginally significant influence (β = -0.09, p = 0.064), indicating a reducing effect on people’s negative expectancies (partly supporting hypothesis 2a; hypothesis 3b is not supported).

In that way, corolla color had a marginally significant negative indirect effect on female fitness via number of flower (Estimate = −0.257, Z = −1.85, p = 0.064; Supplementary Table S2 ; Figure 2B ).

An ANOVA test did not find significant main effects of time as measured by Shannon Entropy and Simpson’s Index (P>0.05; Supplementary Table S4C.2 ), but found marginally significant main effects of time as measured by richness and phylogenetic diversity (P=0.064 and P=0.078; Supplementary Table S4C.2 ).

Termite species had a marginally significant effect on mean CH 4 emissions ( p = 0.064, Figure 3 ), and mounds constructed by C. acinaciformis ( β = 2747.3, p < 0.01, Table S6 ) and N. magnus ( β = 5027.0, p < 0.001, Table S6 ) exhibited significantly higher CH 4 emissions than those built by A. laurensis .

However, the interaction between trial structure and visuomotor mapping was marginally significant ( P = 0.064).

The two-way interaction between Overlap and Prime Type was marginally significant ( t = 1.91, p = 0.064).

ANCOVA analysis showed significant group differences for spot reading ( F (1,55) = 8.58, P = 0.005), marginally significant group difference for fluent reading size ( F (1,45) = 3.61, P = 0.064), and critical print size ( F (1,56) = 3.78, P = 0.057).

10 ) showed a marginally significant ( F = 12.46; P = 0.0640, species-environment relation variance explained by axis 1∶78.6%; and cumulatively by axis 1 and 2∶89.5%) association of adventive species with strawberry guava (clusters A and B, right quadrants of RDA ordination).

Wheat usually had higher δ 13 C values than barley, although this difference was marginally significant (Student’s t -test: t(86) = 1.872, p = 0.064) only for La Bastida.

This relationship was statistically significant for fungicide application ( p < 0.001) and marginally significant for insecticide application ( p = 0.064).

In the Parietal ANCOVA, there were marginally significant 2- and 3-way interactions: Group x LR (p = 0.064) and Group x Condition x LR (p = 0.096).

There was a marginally significant main effect of Cueing Condition [ F (1,13) = 4.1, p = 0.064] with a marginal interaction with Cluster [ F (8,104) = 2.7, p = 0.076] in the time interval 130–170 ms after probe presentation.

Furthermore, a marginally significant 3-way interaction between time window, task, and transition type was observed, F 1,15 = 3.36; P = 0.064.

A marginally significant main effect was found for experts, F (1,36) = 3.89, p = .064, η p 2 = 0.178, indicating that the expert had a longer average fixation time for the AOI than the novice.

Juvenile growth depended on temperature with a marginally significant effect of the level of oxygen (p = 0.064).

Results reveal a marginally significant negative main effect of repetition status ( b = −.081, p = .064), suggesting slightly reduced zygomaticus activities for repeated statements.

Moreover, a marginally significant effects due to age was detected [ F (2, 32) = 2.996, p = 0.064].

Further adjusted for fasting glucose, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C, and white blood cell counts, there was a reduction in the association of NAFLD risk with per one SD of FM/FFM ratio; however, it was still significant in non-obese women (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10–1.50, p = 0.002) and obese women (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04–1.42, p = 0.013), and marginally significant in non-obese and obese men (both p = 0.064) (Table 2 ).

A marginally significant TYPE*GRAM*GROUP interaction (F1(1,48) = 3.6, p = 0.064; F2(1,508) = 3.8, p = 0.052) revealed that participants reacted faster to sentences containing patient subject violations than to the corresponding grammatical sentences (natives: F(1,46) = 16.76, p < 0.001; non-natives: F(1,46) = 5.49, p = 0.023).

The results revealed a marginally significant interaction between experiment/type and level in pain empathy score, F (1, 156) = 3.48, p = 0.064, as well as a significant interaction in empathic concern scores, F (1, 156) = 4.96, p = 0.027.

There was marginally significant effect of condition (Pearson’s χ 2 = 3.44, p = 0.064).

ignava showed a marginally significant association with carotid artery plaque ( P = 0.064), and the association was abolished after further adjustment for conventional CVD risk factors ( P = 0.212).

Although the pairwise comparisons results showed that autonomous appeal message ( M = 5.81, SD = 1.12) generated more intentions of becoming organ donors than a combined related and competent appeal message ( M = 5.19, SD = 1.82) in a marginally significant level, p = 0.064, there was no significant difference between self-determined appeal messages and controlled message in other dependent variables.

Finally, the three-way interaction was marginally significant (β = -0.130, SE = 0.070, z = -1.846, p < 0.064), revealing different grammaticality by attraction patterns in sentences containing singular and plural objects.

Association between HER-2 Immunoreactivity and Clinicopathological Parameters The overexpression of HER-2 was associated with poorly differentiated tumors, but this correlation was marginally significant ( P = 0.064).