“marginally significant”

However, only after 10 days, marginally significant differences between the male and female rats in the phenytoin receiving group were seen for TAC ( p -value = 0.028).

In the pre-specified LME model for visuospatial reasoning, a marginally significant interaction was found between the T1w/T2w ratio of the left fornix and time (std β = 0.38, uncorrected P = 0.028, FDR-corrected P = 0.112).

With regard to the average induced beta-gamma responses ( Figures 3C,D ), the statistical result also revealed a significant main effect of chunking type [Radical > Stoke, F (1,17) = 23.57, p < 0.001, and p -WildBS < 0.001], a marginally significant main effect of Electrode [ F (6,102) = 2.47, p = 0.028 and p -WildBS = 0.055], and a three-way interaction effect [ F (6,102) = 3.61, p = 0.003, and p -WildBS = 0.038].

In a pre-specified secondary analysis, patients randomised to ranolazine had a marginally significant lower risk of ICD therapies for recurrent VT or VF (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.51–0.96; p=0.028).[ 21 ] See Table 2 for a summary of medical therapy studies.

In an analysis of deviance of the sulfoxaflor assay, the “Method” term was marginally significant: χ 2 = 9.1, df = 3, P = 0.028.

Time 4 (First Postoperative Day) rHb increased significantly over time ( p = 0.0001), and we observed a marginally significant regional difference ( p = 0.0285).

Rearing temperature had a marginally significant effect on foraging time—bumblebees reared at 27 °C tended to spend more time out of the hive on foraging trips ( P = 0.029, r 2 = 0.04; Supplementary Fig.

In the case of vertical motion, there is again a highly significant effect of Speed ( F (1.373) = 25.369 p = 0.002) and there is also a marginally significant effect of Separation, ( F (1.174) = 9.369, p = 0.029)–although it is the smallest separation that yields the highest thresholds.

For chemical traits, total phenols exhibited marginally significant positive correlation ( p = 0.029), whereas tannin content showed significant negative correlation ( p = 0.001).

In contrast, matched HLA-DPB1 had a marginally significant effect of protecting against TRM ( P = .029).

This hypothesis fits to our data as genetic diversity ( H e ) and the proportion of polymorphic loci (MAC ≥2) were slightly higher but significant or marginally significant in the southern group (0.803 vs. 0.798, Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.029; 3821 vs. 3090, Mann–Whitney U test, p = 0.052).

A marginally significant correlation exists between this distance and the median difference in DVG abundance among scenarios ( ρ S = 0.794, 4 d.f., 1-tailed P = 0.029), suggesting that lineages evolved under more similar host switching histories tend to show more similar DVG abundances.

Where PD primes featured non-prototypical animacy-semantic role mappings, there was a marginally significant effect of prime-target match, β = −2.33 ( SE = 1.07), z = −2.19, p = 0.029.

Significant and marginally significant differences were detected in DIO vs WTC ( P = .029) and DIO+R vs WTC+R ( P = .052).

Moreover, after performing 10,000 permutations, the p value was marginally significant (codominant model p = 0.029, dominant model p = 0.027).

Similarly, while univariate analysis revealed associations between ctDNA concentration and clinical features (lymph node metastasis with oral rinse-derived ctDNA, p = 0.012; tumor site and T stage with plasma ctDNA, p = 0.010 and p = 0.032, respectively), multiple linear regression modeling for both oral rinse ( R 2 = 0.109) and plasma (R2 = 0.212) ctDNA did not demonstrate strong associations between baseline ctDNA values and these clinical features, although lymph node metastasis remained significant in oral rinse ( p = 0.006) and tumor site remained marginally significant in plasma ( p = 0.029) multivariate models (Supplementary Tables 4 , 5 ).

While a marginally significant correlation was observed between the score and diseases status with genome-wide data (P T <0.3, AGP, P = 0.029; SSC, P = 0.0085), the score based on the neuronal modules was highly significant ( Figure 4 ).

We observed marginally significant changes for sperm motility (49 ± 3% vs. 38 ± 3%, p = 0.029) and a significant difference in follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) with lower level in young subjects (4.09 ± 0.29) compared with old subjects (6.25 ± 0.4, p = 3.66E−05).

Based on a binomial test, we observe a marginally significant overrepresentation of tandem duplications that capture gene sequences vs. solely non-coding sequences in D. yakuba ( P = 0.0291) and highly significant for D. simulans ( P = 9.044 × 10 −5 ).

We found a marginally significant causal relationship from cg06809326 to WMH burden ( P = 2.91 × 10 −2 ).

The global test was marginally significant ( p = 0.0295), likely influenced by this variable.

This analysis revealed no significant contribution of PHYB (Figure S2A in File S3 ), and only a marginally significant interaction for the role of HDA6 at NOR genotypes Ler-Cvi and Ler-Ler – p-value = 0.0298 and p-value = 0.0125, respectively (Figure S2B in File S3 ).

We only detected a marginally significant correlation between the NAc ALFF and HAMD scores in the REST-meta-MDD cohort ( p = .03).

Note, however, that even for these relatively uninformative studies the evidence favors \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\mathcal {H}_{0}$\end{document} H 0 , whereas the respective classical p values equal p = .06 (i.e., “marginally significant”), p = .03 (i.e., “significant, reject \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$\mathcal {H}_{0}$\end{document} H 0 ”), and p = .06 (i.e., “marginally significant”). 3 Finally, consider the evidence for the studies in which the effect is in the opposite direction and most of the posterior mass is concentrated on negative values of ρ .

Nonetheless, when only age was included as covariate, there was a marginally significant effect of MMR status ( P = .03).