“marginally significant”

For instance, there was a marginally significant relationship between the total needs change score and age (r s =0.212, p =.026), indicating that younger participants were more likely to show improvements.

The change in particulate concentrations of mixture was marginally significant in almost all the sub-regions, except for Western Africa, which was statistically significant at p = 0.026, and Northern Africa, which was not significant ( p = 0.973).

When we performed multivariate analyses 1 and 2, in which MYC expression and MYC rearrangement were included as covariates, respectively, the impact of CD24 expression for OS was marginally significant ( p = 0.026285 and 0.0433, respectively; Table 3 ).

Linear regression analysis showed a marginally significant decrease in seminal volume between 1940 and 1990 from 3.40 ml to 2.75 ml with an estimated regression coefficient of −0.013 ml per year ( P = 0.027) and a significant decrease in mean sperm concentration weighted by number of individuals in each publication between 1940 and 1990, from 113 × 10 6 /ml to 66 × 10 6 /ml; the estimated regression coefficient was −0.934 × 10 6 /ml per year ( P < 00001).

There was marginally significant evidence of a source × day interaction ( P = 0.027) for total antioxidant capacity where the numerical increase over time was less for the OH-SeMet than sodium selenite or selenium yeast treatments.

In Mixed Ancestry individuals, who were successfully genotyped for both the GSTT1 and GSTT2B deletions, 13 of 414 controls (0.031) and 16 of 217 cases (0.074) were homozygous for both deletions (genotype Del-Del / Del-Del ), which was a marginally significant difference (p = 0.027).

There were no differences in the male-to-female ratio or in the GA of the animals, although a marginally significant difference was found in the birthweight comparisons ( p = 0.027, one-way ANOVA) with animals in the SF+BUD 1′ having a lower mean birth weight.

The distribution was marginally significant according to the Spearman rho test ( P = 0.027).

Furthermore, a marginally significant interaction of all three factors ( F 2 , 78 = 3.784, p = 0.027, η p 2 = 0.088) reflected reduced left‐hemispheric activation during Food‐NoGo blocks in the OWC compared to both the BED ( t 48 = 2.300, p = 0.026, d = 0.511) and NWC group ( t 50 = 2.310, p = 0.025, d = 0.547).

Furthermore, trauma load [ F (1, 279) = 29.92, p < 0.001, p emp < 0.001] and sex [ F (1, 279) = 9.25, p emp = 0.003, p emp = 0.006] significantly predicted treatment outcome, whereas a marginally significant effect was found for age [ F (1, 279) = 4.93, p = 0.027, p emp = 0.073].

However, only S group showed a significant improvement in upper limb fine motility, expressed in WMFT score ( P = 0.008) (Figure 4 ) and time ( P = 0.008) (Figure 5 ), while improvement in fine motility scale observed in CS group was marginally significant [WMFT score ( P = 0.027) and time ( P = 0.028) (Figures 4 , 5 )].

We observed a marginally significant prediction of FADS1 expression (rs174547 correlation = 0.26, p-value = 0.027; rs107225 correlation = 0.20, p-value = 0.089), and little to no evidence for prediction of FADS3 expression (rs174547 correlation = −0.15, p-value = 0.22; rs102275 correlation = −0.14, p-value = 0.25).

doniana pollen in corbicular loads differed significantly among visitor species ( F 3,33 =10.40, P < 0.0001) and among sites ( F 3,33 = 3.04, P = 0.0426), with a marginally significant interaction among sites and species ( F 3,33 = 2.20, P = 0.0270).

The ANCOVA models confirmed that baseline weight alone was a marginally significant predictor of weight change at end point in the pramlintide [parameter estimate (SE) = −0.0194 (0.0088); P = 0.0276] and placebo [parameter estimate (SE) = −0.0196 (0.0096); P = 0.0420] groups.

Family economic status was associated with broader differences: significant or marginally significant variation emerged for Prosocial Values and Interpersonal Skills ( p = 0.028), Emotional Understanding ( p = 0.035), and overall SEC ( p = 0.050).

Collectively, the data showed marginally significant difference across genders ( p = 0.028).

However, the association between the incidence of CV events and follow-up duration assessed by a weighted linear regression was marginally significant only for fMI ( p -value = 0.028, R 2 = 28%) ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).

) = 0.017, p = 4.5 × 10 −8 ], and for BD, there was a marginally significant correlation at −0.069 (fixed effect model: s.e. = 0.032, p = 0.028) with no statistical heterogeneities ( p > 0.05).

In a pre-specified secondary analysis, patients randomised to ranolazine had a marginally significant lower risk of ICD therapies for recurrent VT or VF (hazard ratio: 0.70; 95% confidence interval: 0.51–0.96; p=0.028).[ 21 ] See Table 2 for a summary of medical therapy studies.

The results moreover showed a significant association between the number of people in the household and co-adoption (OR = 1.26, 95% CI [1.10, 1.45], p = 0.001), but only a marginally significant association for adoption (OR = 1.14, 95% CI [1.01, 1.28], p = 0.028).

Genetic differentiation Single-locus permutation tests performed with the uncorrected database to assess the effect of stepwise mutations on population differentiation [ 19 ] were marginally significant at three out of the eight loci analysed (0.007≤ P ≤ 0.028, see Additional file 1 ).

After correction, the time effect was marginally significant, F (1.64, 50.91) = 4.18, p = 0.028, with a partial η 2 of 0.12, reflecting a small-to-medium effect.

With regard to the average induced beta-gamma responses ( Figures 3C,D ), the statistical result also revealed a significant main effect of chunking type [Radical > Stoke, F (1,17) = 23.57, p < 0.001, and p -WildBS < 0.001], a marginally significant main effect of Electrode [ F (6,102) = 2.47, p = 0.028 and p -WildBS = 0.055], and a three-way interaction effect [ F (6,102) = 3.61, p = 0.003, and p -WildBS = 0.038].

Furthermore, when analyzing effects of intra-articular injection of autologous, microfragmented adipose tissue two years after application, we noted that the extent of magnitude between positive and negative cases was uneven; average decrease was −16.2 ± 1.5%, while the average increase was 32.3 ± 21.9%, what was marginally significant when absolute values were used (P = 0.028).

Similar but marginally significant association of R553W (rs755537970) variant was observed in combined samples with triglycerides (β 0.51± 0.23; p = 0.028).