“marginally significant”

In addition, the univariate comparisons indicated a marginally significant main effect of personalised risk message on positive outcome expectancies, F (1, 324) = 5.00, p = .03, η p 2 = .02 (α = .025).

In fact, the SiCE was apparent only for pairs containing 1 [ F (1, 115) = 34.06, MSE = 166,254, η 2 p = 0.23], with no evidence of linear modulation (Figure 1C ), and was minimal and marginally significant for pairs without 1 [ F (1, 117) = 3.85, MSE = 32,329, η 2 p = 0.03] (Figure 1D ).

Moreover, the relationship between carotenoid chroma and brightness was marginally significant and negative ( r = −.14; p = .030; n = 234; Figure 1c ). 3.2.

However, some differences at individual time points were indicated between males and females, such as in the first 3 months marginally significant differences in WAZ between the sexes were found, with slightly lower values in males ( p = 0.03).

Only one Q statistic was marginally significant ( p = 0 . 03 )—the variance of the residuals in model m2 was significantly low in the age range 15.1–16.3, indicating that its fitted σ was too high at that age.

[ 16 ] noted a marginally significant ( P = 0.03) negative correlation between intron divergence and size for first introns (but not other introns) in the dataset of Halligan et al.

There was a marginally significant interaction of cue presence and directional cue type, F (1,81) = 4.67, p = .03, η p 2 = .06, indicating, if anything, that there was a larger difference in performance between the control and arrow conditions than the control and human figure conditions.

Furthermore, marginally significant association was also observed for lung cancer and head neck cancer with OR of 2.38 (95%CI: 1.06-5.36, P=0.03) and of 2.40 (95%CI: 1.46-3.93, P=0.001), respectively.

Residential location in the metropolitan area (1.10, 1.01 to 1.19) was marginally significant (P=0.03).

Ultimately, driven primarily by its significant advantage in reliability metrics, Bilibili also achieved a marginally significant victory in the DISCERN Total score (45.56 vs 42.56, P = .03).

Marginally significant ability was detected for NLR values (AUC: 0.563, 95% CI: 0.505 to 0.621; P = 0.030), and the abilities of other leukocyte subtypes to discriminate an LVO were not significant (Figure S 1 and Table S 2 in the Supplementary material).

Weekly consumption of 1–7 units of wine was associated with a marginally significant smaller decline, while consumption of 8–14 units of wine was associated with a decline that was 1.5 IQ points lower ( p = 0.030) than no consumption of wine.

Finally, Interaction Consistency (E7) had a marginally significant effect on PU (β = 0.105, p = 0.030), yet showed no significant effects on PEOU or BI (p > 0.05).

Additionally, the difference between the depression control and bipolar test groups was marginally significant ( p = 0.03), and a significant difference was found between bipolar test and bipolar control groups ( p < 0.01).

However, for those who were ever smokers, we identified a marginally significant association between genetically predicted T2DM risk and lung cancer risk (OR = 0.92; 95%CI = 0.85–0.99; p = 0.03) although no significant association was observed in never smokers ( OR = 1.00; 95%CI = 0.93–1.07; p = 0.96; P heterogeneity = 0.13).

In the 6 case studies involving more than one display trait, there was never a significant relationship between trait means and our estimates for Δt ( P ≥ 0.31) or for Δp ( P ≥ 0.33); in four of the case studies the relationship between trait mean and preference strength was also non-significant ( P ≥ 0.35), but in 2 case studies it was significant or marginally significant ( Gryllus spp.; P = 0.03; Enchenopa ; P = 0.07, although the latter relationship was negative).

Marginally significant allele-level associations for HLA-B ⁣ ∗ 18:01:01 (OR = 5.06, p =0.03) and -B ⁣ ∗ 58:02:01 (OR = 0.22, p =0.04) alleles did not withstand correction for multiple comparisons.

We were able to detect expression of all genes under the described conditions except for BAX , but only PHLDA3 showed a marginally significant higher expression in B0/- feathers (Student’s t-test, P = 0.03; S3 Fig ).

In addition, PHACTR1 had a stronger association with CAC among current smokers ( p = 6.2 × 10 −7 ) than former smokers ( p = 7.5 × 10 −3 ) and the SNP by smoking status interaction was marginally significant ( p = 0.03).

There was no statistically detectable interaction among the treatments ( F 1,6 = 0.29, p = 0.59); however, there was a marginally significant brood effect ( F 6,18 = 2.9, p = 0.03).

GD, on the other hand, increased from Identical to EPW masks (marginally significant, p =0.03), but did not differ between EPW, GPW, and Illegal masks, and increased from Illegal to X masks (Pattern: Identical < EPW = GPW = Illegal < X).

For major coronary events in the primary prevention trials, the 11 separate tests for trend or heterogeneity of effect yielded only one, between men and women, that was marginally significant (p=0·03; figure 3 and webappendix p 4 ) if considered in isolation, but it was no longer significant if multiplied by 11 to allow for multiple comparisons (p=0·33).

Regarding statistical comparisons between Groups 1 and 2, interaction post hoc tests identified a marginally significant difference in mean intragastric pH between treatment groups on day 1 ( P = .03) but not for MPT intragastric pH ≥3 and ≥4 ( P = .15 and P = .30).

In women, the three polymorphisms showed a marginally significant association with fractures in the unadjusted analysis (rs1801132, p = 0.03; rs3020314, p = 0.04; rs1884051, p = 0.03), but it was no longer significant (p > 0.2) after including age as a covariate.

The effect of trauma center level remained marginally significant after controlling for ISS score (p = 0.03, delta BIC = 2.3).