“marginally significant”

Here, we found a significant increase for the POST group compared to the RELAX group (t(52) = 4.86; d = 1.3, p<.01) and a marginally significant change for the SIM group compared to the RELAX group (t(52) = 2.43; d = 0.67, p = .02).

Larger models displayed architectural divergence where qwen2.5:72b maintained cross-lingual consistency (82.6% vs 83.5%; OR 0.88, P =1.000), while Llama3.1:70b showed language-dependent performance (80.2% vs 90.1%; OR 0.29, P =.02, marginally significant).

From the quantitative data of lids, seven out of nine aWCDs were lower than the mean and median values of the aBCDs and aSLDs ( S1B Fig ), and the difference between aWCDs and aBCDs was marginally significant ( P -value = 0.02; S1C Fig .

Another marginally significant gene by treatment interaction for SBP response was observed for F7 rs762637 when comparing lisinopril to chlorthalidone (P=0.02).

Finally, 519 of these gene overlapped with the genes dysregulated in either autism, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression or alcoholism [ 34 ], with a marginally significant overrepresentation for the schizophrenia group (Fisher’s exact test OR [95%CI] = 1.3 [1.04, Inf], p = 0.02, Supplementary Fig.

The β niche traits showed clustering in NTI and NRI indicating that local communities are composed of a subset of β niche trait states different from one drawn at random (Wilcoxon test, P < 0.01, except for NTI with incidence data where Wilcoxon test was marginally significant, P < 0.02) (Fig. 2 ).

Another study involving the same participants showed a marginally significant association between excessive polypharmacy and prolonged hospital stay (parameter estimate = 0.20; R 2 value = 0.01; p ‐value = 0.02) (Jeong et al. 2018 ).

( 2007a ), there was a significant effect of SOA [ F1 (2, 26) = 74.9, η p 2 = 0.811, p < 0.001, F2 (2, 84) = 101.8, η p 2 = 0.703, p < 0.001], an effect of frequency significant by participants and marginally significant by-items [ F1 (1, 13) = 29.1, η p 2 = 0.69, p < 0.02, F2 (1, 42) = 3.4, η p 2 = 0.069, p < 0.08] and no interaction ( F1 < 1, F2 = 1.5).

In this study, IELSG score showed marginally significant difference between BCL-6 (+) and BCL-6 (-) ( P = 0.02).

The rs6950765 × age interaction was marginally significant in both the left and right hemispheres (left side: F = 4.05, p = 0.020; right side: F = 0.065, p = 0.033).

4 D), although inter-individual variability resulted in a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.02).

The effect of NO 3 and the interaction between NO 3 and OE were insignificant, but the difference in mean survival between heated tanks with and without OE was marginally significant (t 15 = –2.63, P = 0.020).

We found IBD with marginally significant values of r = .42 ( p = .02) among all populations, but none within basins (Table S2 ).

1C ), we recalculated the burden test excluding both rs3792646 and rs2271708, and observed a marginally significant enrichment of rare variants in cases ( P = 0.02), suggesting the existence of multiple effect alleles in C7 .

The difference between groups GV (87%) and V (53%) was marginally significant (corrected α = 0.017, Z = 1.99, P = 0.02), though the difference between groups G (67%) and V (53%) was non-significant ( Z = 0.74, P = 0.23), and the difference between groups GV (87%) and G (67%) was not significant either ( Z = 1.29, P = 0.09).

All methods except Pagel’s λ detected a marginally significant phylogenetic signal in the K. pneumoniae core genome (Supplementary Data 3 [first tab]; 0.11 > P > 0.02).

Further pairwise comparisons revealed significantly lower AUC for the participant-conducted urine rapid test compared to the blood rapid test ( P =0.002) ( Figure 1B ), marginally significant differences between the staff-conducted urine rapid test and blood rapid test ( P =0.020) ( Figure 1C ), and no significant difference between staff-conducted and participant-conducted urine rapid tests ( P =0.317) ( Figure 1D ).

The latent space embeddings of the RIT were marginally significant in predicting Factor 2 (‘compulsive behavior and intrusive thought’) (ROC AUC = 0.75, P = 0.02, uncorrected for multiples comparisons, P = 0.06 Bonferroni‐corrected).

However, we did find a marginally significant difference in gender, with slightly more boys missing data (N = 102) compared to girls (N = 95), p = 0.02.

To test for OXT administration effects on ratings, pairwise comparisons showed a marginally significant effect for ratings of neutral images ( Z = −2.32, p = .02), which did not survive the threshold of .009, with lower ratings after OXT ( M = 1.003, SD = 0.90) compared to placebo ( M = 1.25, SD = 0.88).

In another study (data from TCGA), the results confirmed that HER2-tumors have a marginally significant ( P =0.02, Wilcox rank-sum test) lower TMB than HER2+ tumors (data not shown).

The pooled HR is 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85–0.98), indicating a marginally significant overall effect (P = 0.02).

There is a small but marginally significant difference (p = 0.02, t-test) between the mean copy number of the Ethiopian HIV-only and the HIV-TB co-infected cohort, although this is not replicated in the smaller Tanzanian cohort (p = 0.69).

Treatment group was not significant overall (P = 0.74) but the interaction of treatment with time was marginally significant (P = 0.02) suggesting that the treatment effect may be time dependent.

A marginally significant difference between males and females ( F 1,36 = 6.37, p = 0.02) was identified, with males having on average, higher post-participation Overall Health scores when adjusting for pre-participation score, age, diagnosis and military service era.