We detected a marginally significant reduction in TKW associated with the gpc-A1 and gpc-A1/gpc-B2 mutant genotypes ( P =0.02, Additional file 1 : Figure S2a).
← all phrases
“marginally significant”
Sighted at
p>=0.1
In the literature
The pooled HR is 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85–0.98), indicating a marginally significant overall effect (P = 0.02).
The 2 group×3 stem type ANOVAs on response time to speech stimuli yielded marginally significant main effects of stem-type (F1(2,68) = 4.64, p<.02, F2(2, 29) = 2.20, p<.13).
Another study involving the same participants showed a marginally significant association between excessive polypharmacy and prolonged hospital stay (parameter estimate = 0.20; R 2 value = 0.01; p ‐value = 0.02) (Jeong et al. 2018 ).
The difference between groups GV (87%) and V (53%) was marginally significant (corrected α = 0.017, Z = 1.99, P = 0.02), though the difference between groups G (67%) and V (53%) was non-significant ( Z = 0.74, P = 0.23), and the difference between groups GV (87%) and G (67%) was not significant either ( Z = 1.29, P = 0.09).
For the two individuals as a pair ( Fig 3B ), the proportion is lower (3.1±0.8%, p = 0.8), and the evidence against models without WHG-related ancestry is weaker (although still marginally significant; p = 0.02–0.04).
Asian students (β = −0.33, p = 0.06 [marginally significant]) and Turkish/Moroccan/African students (β = −0.43, p = 0.02) were less likely to receive upgrades, as compared with native Dutch students.
4 D), although inter-individual variability resulted in a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.02).
Multi-agent chemotherapy was shown to be linked with a marginally significant increase in overall survival (HR:0.79, p = 0.02) and a marginally significant increase in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR:0.86, p = 0.05) [ 69 ].
There was no evidence of deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in controls ( P = 0.95), but in cases there was marginally significant evidence of such deviation, with a deficiency of heterozygotes (565 observed versus 605.3 expected; P = 0.02).
A one-way analysis of variance suggested that the between-network effect was marginally significant ( F = 2.4, P < 0.02).
A marginally significant simple main effect of type of pre-activation was observed within match trials, F (1, 29) = 6.66, p = 0.02, η 2 ρ = 0.19, but not in mismatch trials, F (1, 29) = 2.22, p = 0.15, η 2 ρ = 0.07.
1C ), we recalculated the burden test excluding both rs3792646 and rs2271708, and observed a marginally significant enrichment of rare variants in cases ( P = 0.02), suggesting the existence of multiple effect alleles in C7 .
Anxiety scores were also a marginally significant factor for self-reported overall pain (β = 3.00; 95% CI, 0.45 to 5.56; P = .02).
Unlike RBP-repressed exons, RBP-activated exons showed only a marginally significant ( P < 0.02) difference between RBNS+ and RBNS– peaks (in the opposite direction) in the downstream intron region and no significant difference elsewhere (Extended Data Fig. 4e ).
As for the fair test 2, the Kruskal–Wallis tests report marginally significant differences in PT ( χ 2 = 7.824, df = 2, p = 0.02) and MET ( χ 2 = 6.600, df = 2, p = 0.037) and significant differences in ET ( χ 2 = 78.111, df = 2, p < 0.001) between score groups.
In the UK Biobank, rs6424532 [ LOC105378800 ] had a statistically significant indirect effect on broad depression through the log of pack-years of cigarette smoking ( p = 4.0 × 10 −4 ) among all participants and a marginally significant indirect effect among females ( p = 0.02) and males ( p = 4.0 × 10 −3 ).
This was marginally significant ( p = 0.02) on a direct t test, but not on an ANOVA including GMRw/IP 3 R-RNAi data with and without EGTA ( p = 0.18).
The same correlation for the AM participants was marginally significant, r = .41, t (29) = 2.39, p =.02 (cf.
Notwithstanding, higher anti-P7 antibody absorbances correlated with higher disease indexes and could be a marker of disease activity, although the correlation was marginally significant (Spearman’s rank test, p<0.02, Fig 8 ).
Mothers' lower FES Cohesion score also predicted Internalising ( P =0.01) and Externalising ( P =0.001) problems and was marginally significant for Total Problems ( P =0.02).
Pooling of effect size showed a marginally significant protective effect between the highest and lowest levels of physical activity (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84–1.00, I 2 = 42.3%, p = 0.02) seen in Fig. 3 .
( 2007a ), there was a significant effect of SOA [ F1 (2, 26) = 74.9, η p 2 = 0.811, p < 0.001, F2 (2, 84) = 101.8, η p 2 = 0.703, p < 0.001], an effect of frequency significant by participants and marginally significant by-items [ F1 (1, 13) = 29.1, η p 2 = 0.69, p < 0.02, F2 (1, 42) = 3.4, η p 2 = 0.069, p < 0.08] and no interaction ( F1 < 1, F2 = 1.5).
There was a marginally significant effect on population growth for bacteria exposed to different phage concentrations (KW, df = 2, P < 0.02), suggesting that the encounter rate between bacteria and phage is important in determining the population-level strength of the fission response.
There was a marginally significant interaction for semantic similarity [F(4, 13,766) = 2.92, p = 0.02, η 2 = .001]; however, given the sample sizes involved in this analysis, a marginally significant result is unlikely to be meaningful.