marginally significantp = 0.02
4 D), although inter-individual variability resulted in a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.02).
4 D), although inter-individual variability resulted in a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.02).
2 D), and this was confirmed by a highly significant reduction in their corrected mass (Fig. 2 E).
At 6 months of age, we noted a pronounced trend towards reduced muscle mass, which was not statistically significant at the level of individual muscles, but highly significant when considering the cumulated muscle mass, represented by the body mass of the animals (Table 1 ).